Talk:Letter of marque: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Letter of marque
 
|                cat1 = Law
== Not quite a simple as Paul makes it ==
|                cat2 = Politics
 
|                cat3 =  
Aside from some of the legal and operational considerations I noted briefly, I'm honestly trying to figure out what the private vessel. I'm not convinced that a letter of reprisal would be needed for a ship to arm itself in self-defense; see, I believe, Articles 98-102 of the UN [[Convention on the Law of the Sea.
|          cat_check = Y
 
|              status = 2
I can personally support that. I am far less sure, however, what offensive privateer operations could accomplish. The most obvious thing would be the "Q-ship": create attractive targets for the pirates, which in fact are heavily armed, are clearly in international waters, and have permissive rules of engagement to use lethal force on boats that get one warning to stay away -- skiffs do not sail 200 miles from shore.  [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|        underlinked = Y
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 18:27, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 12:30, 17 April 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A government authorization which allows a private ship to act as a ship of war in naval engagements with the ships of another nation. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Law and Politics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Not quite a simple as Paul makes it

Aside from some of the legal and operational considerations I noted briefly, I'm honestly trying to figure out what the private vessel. I'm not convinced that a letter of reprisal would be needed for a ship to arm itself in self-defense; see, I believe, Articles 98-102 of the UN [[Convention on the Law of the Sea.

I can personally support that. I am far less sure, however, what offensive privateer operations could accomplish. The most obvious thing would be the "Q-ship": create attractive targets for the pirates, which in fact are heavily armed, are clearly in international waters, and have permissive rules of engagement to use lethal force on boats that get one warning to stay away -- skiffs do not sail 200 miles from shore. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Letter_of_marque&oldid=27173"