User talk:Eric Winesett: Difference between revisions
imported>Eric Winesett No edit summary |
imported>Aleta Curry (→Hi Eric!: new section) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Thank you very much for your encouraging comments at [[Talk:Contraception (medical methods)/Draft]]. What I've been doing is going ahead and editing in any changes (small or large) except those which I think have a significant risk of being rejected by others. Perhaps I need to adjust that: only those with a larger risk of being rejected could be suggested first on the talk page, while those with a smaller risk of being rejected could be edited in and then reverted (with explanation) by others if necessary. My habits might be based on a misunderstanding that I and some others had earlier, that reverting was against the rules; I think it turned out that it was only reverting without explanation that was against the rules. So perhaps I can be bolder in general. Yes, some of the changes you did were the same as some things I had suggested; others were different. I only went through the article once so there may have been things I missed. I agree with you that an article should have things like subject-verb agreement fixed before approval. --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 07:35, 3 June 2007 (CDT) | Thank you very much for your encouraging comments at [[Talk:Contraception (medical methods)/Draft]]. What I've been doing is going ahead and editing in any changes (small or large) except those which I think have a significant risk of being rejected by others. Perhaps I need to adjust that: only those with a larger risk of being rejected could be suggested first on the talk page, while those with a smaller risk of being rejected could be edited in and then reverted (with explanation) by others if necessary. My habits might be based on a misunderstanding that I and some others had earlier, that reverting was against the rules; I think it turned out that it was only reverting without explanation that was against the rules. So perhaps I can be bolder in general. Yes, some of the changes you did were the same as some things I had suggested; others were different. I only went through the article once so there may have been things I missed. I agree with you that an article should have things like subject-verb agreement fixed before approval. --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 07:35, 3 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Film--media or visual arts or what? == | |||
Hi Eric--where did you initiate the discussion of what category popular movies were to go into? I've broken down and joined the CZ forums.... [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 00:08, 6 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
== On vacation == | |||
I am on vacation, possibly without internet access, until June 16th. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 00:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Write-a-thon, again! == | |||
Hi, Eric! You've been busy with the core articles, cool! Are you coming to the [[CZ:Monthly Write-a-Thon|party]]? [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 06:08, 3 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Mr. D. Duck == | |||
You're right; it's redundant. Apologies! --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:58, 9 November 2007 (CST) | |||
:So glad that resolved quickly. I was dreading a long argument. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:17, 9 November 2007 (CST) | |||
::Now you ''know'' I have to be nosy about this one. [Running to do 'search' on D. Duck!] [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 14:21, 15 November 2007 (CST) | |||
== Film Workgroup == | |||
Yes, desperately needed. What to do??? [[user:Aleta_Curry#Film, TV, etc.|Chat about this]] [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 14:19, 15 November 2007 (CST) | |||
== Jung == | |||
Okey-dokey! Cheers... --[[User:Michael J. Formica|Michael J. Formica]] 07:14, 18 November 2007 (CST) | |||
== Don't forget the December party! == | |||
Know how shy you are--here's your personal invitation. [[CZ: Monthly Write-a-Thon|be there]]! [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 02:40, 5 December 2007 (CST) | |||
== Superman == | |||
Saw your name in the Superman article history. I wanted to point out that your article is the lead from the Wikipedia article which I helped write. I can't work out how on earth to let anyone know this or tag the article as being so, but someone needs to correct this. You can compare it here, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman]. [[User:Stephen Block|Stephen Block]] 06:46, 31 January 2008 (CST) | |||
== Hi Eric! == | |||
Gee, you've been awfully quiet lately! I miss your input. Yes, it’s a new month, and here’s your friendly reminder that the [[CZ:Monthly Write-a-Thon|FEBRUARY PARTY]] is on, and we’d love to see you there! Come join in the general fun. [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 15:35, 6 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:35, 6 February 2008
Hi, Eric-- I will try to expand on the articles I've started but just haven't had the time yet. I never intended for any to remain stubs indefinitely.--Greg Lawrence 19:42, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Being bold
Thank you very much for your encouraging comments at Talk:Contraception (medical methods)/Draft. What I've been doing is going ahead and editing in any changes (small or large) except those which I think have a significant risk of being rejected by others. Perhaps I need to adjust that: only those with a larger risk of being rejected could be suggested first on the talk page, while those with a smaller risk of being rejected could be edited in and then reverted (with explanation) by others if necessary. My habits might be based on a misunderstanding that I and some others had earlier, that reverting was against the rules; I think it turned out that it was only reverting without explanation that was against the rules. So perhaps I can be bolder in general. Yes, some of the changes you did were the same as some things I had suggested; others were different. I only went through the article once so there may have been things I missed. I agree with you that an article should have things like subject-verb agreement fixed before approval. --Catherine Woodgold 07:35, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
Film--media or visual arts or what?
Hi Eric--where did you initiate the discussion of what category popular movies were to go into? I've broken down and joined the CZ forums.... Aleta Curry 00:08, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
On vacation
I am on vacation, possibly without internet access, until June 16th. --Eric Winesett 00:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
Write-a-thon, again!
Hi, Eric! You've been busy with the core articles, cool! Are you coming to the party? Aleta Curry 06:08, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
Mr. D. Duck
You're right; it's redundant. Apologies! --Robert W King 09:58, 9 November 2007 (CST)
- So glad that resolved quickly. I was dreading a long argument. --Eric Winesett 11:17, 9 November 2007 (CST)
- Now you know I have to be nosy about this one. [Running to do 'search' on D. Duck!] Aleta Curry 14:21, 15 November 2007 (CST)
Film Workgroup
Yes, desperately needed. What to do??? Chat about this Aleta Curry 14:19, 15 November 2007 (CST)
Jung
Okey-dokey! Cheers... --Michael J. Formica 07:14, 18 November 2007 (CST)
Don't forget the December party!
Know how shy you are--here's your personal invitation. be there! Aleta Curry 02:40, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Superman
Saw your name in the Superman article history. I wanted to point out that your article is the lead from the Wikipedia article which I helped write. I can't work out how on earth to let anyone know this or tag the article as being so, but someone needs to correct this. You can compare it here, [1]. Stephen Block 06:46, 31 January 2008 (CST)
Hi Eric!
Gee, you've been awfully quiet lately! I miss your input. Yes, it’s a new month, and here’s your friendly reminder that the FEBRUARY PARTY is on, and we’d love to see you there! Come join in the general fun. Aleta Curry 15:35, 6 February 2008 (CST)