Zen: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
(add links section)
imported>Meg Taylor
(move content to subgroup)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Zen''' is a school of [[Mahayana|Mahāyāna]] [[Buddhism]] notable for its emphasis on the attainment of [[Bodhi|awakening]]. As such, it de-emphasizes both [[Theory|theoretical]] [[knowledge]] and the study of [[religious text]]s in favor of direct individual experience of one's own [[Buddha-nature|true nature]].  
{{subpages}}
'''Zen''' (禅; Chinese chán; "meditation") is a school of [[Mahayana Buddhism]] originating in China as a distinct school, though it had some background in [[India]] and claimed to be derived from the enlightenment-experience of [[Sakyamuni]] and transmitted to [[Bodhidharma]], considered to be the founder of Zen in China, probably in the early 5th century A.D. Zen, as a Chinese product, emerged in the teachings of Hui-neng around 675. Zen masters claim that conceptual knowledge, including religious texts, will not lead to a direct experience of one's own True Nature. D.T. Suzuki, an exponent of Zen writes that Zen is ''universal'' and is "''being life itself''". Suzuki explains: "When I say that Zen is life, I mean that zen is not to be confined within conceptualization, that Zen is what makes conceptualization possible, and therefore that Zen is not to be identified with any particular brand of 'ism.'" <ref>Suzuki, D.T.,(1956) Zen Buddhism. Doubleday Books, New York</ref>


The emergence of Zen as a distinct school of Buddhism was first documented in [[China]] in the [[7th century]] [[Common Era|CE]]. It is thought to have developed as an amalgam of various currents in Mahāyāna Buddhist thought—among them the [[Yogacara|Yogācāra]] and [[Madhyamaka]] philosophies and the ''[[Perfection of Wisdom|Prajñāpāramitā]]'' literature—and of local traditions in China, particularly [[Taoism|Daoism]] and [[Huayan|Huáyán Buddhism]]. From China, Zen subsequently spread southwards to [[Vietnam]] and eastwards to [[Korea]] and [[Japan]]. In the late [[19th century|19th]] and early [[20th century|20th centuries]],  Zen also began to establish a notable presence in [[North America]] and [[Europe]].
Zen is not a philosophy in the traditional Western sense where intellectual understanding is a goal. Life is found in the living. To know is to do.


As an Eastern philosophy, Zen is not a philosophy in the traditional Western sense where mere intellectual knowledge is the goal. Zen teachers frequently employ the [[koan]], a kind of question which admits of no immediate rational answer -- as a teaching tool.
==<small>Koan</small>==
The koan (公案; Chinese gōng'àn; lit., "public [law] case," but also "mysterious case") is a kind of poem.  It is not, say Zen adherents, something that can be examined or analyzed. Zen teachers frequently employ the koan, a kind of question which admits of no immediate rational answer, as a teaching tool to bring about a "Satori" without which there is no Zen.  For example one koan states "The sound of one hand clapping." While this may sound paradoxical to a rational mind, it is very obvious to anyone who has done that.  


The koan is not something that is figured out. For example one koan states "The sound of one hand clapping." While this may sound paradoxical, it is very simple once the point is grasped.  
Zen is not a doctrine to be grasped but if you try anyway, Masters say that it is not this, it is not that. Enlightenment  is the central teaching of Zen which does not come from a book or revelation. For example, one koan goes like this - "Do not mistake the pointing finger for the moon." Our concepts are but pointing fingers and are dualistic in that there is that which is pointed at and there is that which is not pointed at. This distinction implies a separation which in turn suggests a difference. But this difference comes from the self. It is self-imposed on us. Enlightenment then is not gaining of a secret/supreme knowledge, enlightenment is knowledge that the "self" had duped itself into thinking it was all there is. Enlightenment is KNOWING for the first time that we really didn't know what we were thinking/talking about in the first place.  


Zen is not something to be studied. For example one koan goes like this - "Do not mistake the pointing finger for the moon." Thus Zen does not ask that pointing fingers be studied.  
Proponents of almost every school claim that there is a Self, notice the capitalization, and a small self. It is the small self, our ego, they tell us, which views reality  (Maya) through the mind. Self, as in whole Self, is the ground or whole Self. Outwardly we experience ourselves as separate from the rest of all of it. While inwardly, we are all the whole where no distinction can be made between this and that. The Roman Poet Lucretius <!--(?)-->, said, "and where there is no distinction, there is no difference,"


If the two koans are used together, then it comes out as do not mistake the pointing finger for the moon, instead study the sound of one hand clapping.  
Ultimately, on the words of Ken Wilber, "The purpose of an integral/life/practice is to realize the full spectrum of your unique and special capacities." (p. 160)<ref>Wilber, Ken. (2007) The Integral Vision. Shambhala Publications ISBN 978-1-59030-475-4</ref>


When one becomes proficient at that, then reality presents itself without the conceptual chatter of the mind. [1]
==<small>Zazen</small>==


===External links==
Because Zen is action, several methodologies are employed in order to bring about a Satori and subsequent "enlightenment." One of those techniques is meditation or "Zazen" (坐禅; Chinese zuòchán; "sitting meditation"). Here the goal is to take control of the mind with the eventual goal of leaving the mind behind much like one leaves a boat behind after crossing the stream.  
*[http://iriz.hanazono.ac.jp/zen_centers/country_list_e.html#America The International Research Insitute for Zen Buddhism]]'s list of Zen Centers in [[North America]].


[[Category: Religion Workgroup]]
Perhaps more importantly, because Zen is freedom from the constraints of the mind, proper thought and action must come first. It can be dangerous to achieve Selfhood if one is encumbered with "bad habits" which are not consistent with those of the greater Self.
[[Category: Philosophy Workgroup]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 08:51, 19 September 2013

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Zen (禅; Chinese chán; "meditation") is a school of Mahayana Buddhism originating in China as a distinct school, though it had some background in India and claimed to be derived from the enlightenment-experience of Sakyamuni and transmitted to Bodhidharma, considered to be the founder of Zen in China, probably in the early 5th century A.D. Zen, as a Chinese product, emerged in the teachings of Hui-neng around 675. Zen masters claim that conceptual knowledge, including religious texts, will not lead to a direct experience of one's own True Nature. D.T. Suzuki, an exponent of Zen writes that Zen is universal and is "being life itself". Suzuki explains: "When I say that Zen is life, I mean that zen is not to be confined within conceptualization, that Zen is what makes conceptualization possible, and therefore that Zen is not to be identified with any particular brand of 'ism.'" [1]

Zen is not a philosophy in the traditional Western sense where intellectual understanding is a goal. Life is found in the living. To know is to do.

Koan

The koan (公案; Chinese gōng'àn; lit., "public [law] case," but also "mysterious case") is a kind of poem. It is not, say Zen adherents, something that can be examined or analyzed. Zen teachers frequently employ the koan, a kind of question which admits of no immediate rational answer, as a teaching tool to bring about a "Satori" without which there is no Zen. For example one koan states "The sound of one hand clapping." While this may sound paradoxical to a rational mind, it is very obvious to anyone who has done that.

Zen is not a doctrine to be grasped but if you try anyway, Masters say that it is not this, it is not that. Enlightenment is the central teaching of Zen which does not come from a book or revelation. For example, one koan goes like this - "Do not mistake the pointing finger for the moon." Our concepts are but pointing fingers and are dualistic in that there is that which is pointed at and there is that which is not pointed at. This distinction implies a separation which in turn suggests a difference. But this difference comes from the self. It is self-imposed on us. Enlightenment then is not gaining of a secret/supreme knowledge, enlightenment is knowledge that the "self" had duped itself into thinking it was all there is. Enlightenment is KNOWING for the first time that we really didn't know what we were thinking/talking about in the first place.

Proponents of almost every school claim that there is a Self, notice the capitalization, and a small self. It is the small self, our ego, they tell us, which views reality (Maya) through the mind. Self, as in whole Self, is the ground or whole Self. Outwardly we experience ourselves as separate from the rest of all of it. While inwardly, we are all the whole where no distinction can be made between this and that. The Roman Poet Lucretius , said, "and where there is no distinction, there is no difference,"

Ultimately, on the words of Ken Wilber, "The purpose of an integral/life/practice is to realize the full spectrum of your unique and special capacities." (p. 160)[2]

Zazen

Because Zen is action, several methodologies are employed in order to bring about a Satori and subsequent "enlightenment." One of those techniques is meditation or "Zazen" (坐禅; Chinese zuòchán; "sitting meditation"). Here the goal is to take control of the mind with the eventual goal of leaving the mind behind much like one leaves a boat behind after crossing the stream.

Perhaps more importantly, because Zen is freedom from the constraints of the mind, proper thought and action must come first. It can be dangerous to achieve Selfhood if one is encumbered with "bad habits" which are not consistent with those of the greater Self.

References

  1. Suzuki, D.T.,(1956) Zen Buddhism. Doubleday Books, New York
  2. Wilber, Ken. (2007) The Integral Vision. Shambhala Publications ISBN 978-1-59030-475-4