Talk:9-11 Attack: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Denis Cavanagh
 
(103 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = 9-11 Attack
|                cat1 = History
|                cat2 = Politics
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 13:12, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
}}


==Questions==
== For crying out loud ==
Now, there exists (thanks to guess how):
* [[9-11 Attack]]
* [[9-11 Attack in New York]]
* [[9-11 Commission/Definition]] which redirects to [[9-11 Commission]]
* [[9-11 Hijackers]]
* [[9-11 conspiracy theory]]


Is this the best title for this article? Looking at the redirects already creates, other options would be "September 11th terrorist attack", or "September 11, 2001 attacks", and the plural (or singular) of the existing title or the options. My personal preference would be [[September 11, 2001 attack]] or [[September 11, 2001 al-Qaeda attack]], but it's not a strong preference. I do think the title should be singular, as it was one coordinated effort.
All these must be merged into a single, comprehensive article that can be kept up-to-date in one location. Grrrr. I will make all these articles and add their merger/renaming to my todo list. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 13:42, 9 March 2024 (CST)
 
There are at least a couple of naming questions: How should the group, and its leader, be referred to? The article inconsistently uses [[al Qaeda]] and [[al-Qaeda]], and uses [[Usama bin Ladin]], even though almost everyone other than the U.S. government uses "Osama" rather than "Usama". [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 13:12, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
::very good points! I prefer the "9-11" variation as more pointed than "Spetember 11" (it downplays the month -- also because 911 is the emergency phone #). Yes, "Osama" is better and I will change that. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 15:56, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
:::I'd prefer "9/11" to "9-11", but that messes with the mediawiki software. It'll be nice to see a good article here without having to constantly chase off the conspiracy theorists like they do at Wikipedia. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 16:52, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
::I think the plural sounds better than the singular, but it's definitely better to use "September 11" rather than "9-11". [[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 09:08, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 
==Objections==
 
I'm sorry but was this written by the issuing office of the Project for a New American century? This is extremely biased, especially the Saddam Hussein part when you hint he had a hand in 9/11. He did not.
 
Is there anyway we can clean this up to meet standards? [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 04:12, 25 July 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 09:19, 28 May 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A massive terrorist attack on the United States, occurring on September 11, 2001. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Politics [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  American politics since 1945
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant American English

For crying out loud

Now, there exists (thanks to guess how):

All these must be merged into a single, comprehensive article that can be kept up-to-date in one location. Grrrr. I will make all these articles and add their merger/renaming to my todo list. Pat Palmer (talk) 13:42, 9 March 2024 (CST)