Talk:Slater determinant: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
 
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I copied this from Wikipedia and removed the numerous errors and inaccuracies. For instance, Hartree did not use spinorbitals, but spatial orbitals. The definition of '''x''' was not given. I entered in the Wiki article a reference to Slater's original 1929 paper in Physical Review. I noticed that some brilliant Wikipedian found it necessary to change it to Physics. Review :-( --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:26, 18 August 2007 (CDT)
{{subpages}}
 
I copied this article from Wikipedia and removed numerous errors and inaccuracies. For instance, Hartree did not use spinorbitals, but spatial orbitals. The crucial definition of '''x'''<sub>''i''</sub> was not given. I entered in the Wiki article a reference to Slater's original 1929 paper in Physical Review. I noticed that some Wikipedian changed it to Physics. Review. Somebody entered an expression with ''det'' in the Wiki version which is completely out of place and in wrong fonts. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:38, 18 August 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 17:32, 14 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A form for the wavefunction of a multi-fermionic system that satisfies anti-symmetry requirements, and consequently the Pauli exclusion principle, by changing sign upon exchange of fermions. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories chemistry and physics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I copied this article from Wikipedia and removed numerous errors and inaccuracies. For instance, Hartree did not use spinorbitals, but spatial orbitals. The crucial definition of xi was not given. I entered in the Wiki article a reference to Slater's original 1929 paper in Physical Review. I noticed that some Wikipedian changed it to Physics. Review. Somebody entered an expression with det in the Wiki version which is completely out of place and in wrong fonts. --Paul Wormer 07:38, 18 August 2007 (CDT)