Satellite communications: Difference between revisions
imported>Caesar Schinas m (Robot: Changing template: TOC-right) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Satellites operating in the [[ITU Frequency Bands|Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)]] offer the advantage of simple receivers and antennas, with plausible connectivity between the satellite and a handheld or other [[portable]] receiver. The disadvantage is that such communications rarely support high data rates, but that is perfectly acceptable in some applications, where short messages are meaningful. Civilian examples include [[Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon]]s (EPIRB), which send short distress messages to the [[COSPAS-SARSAT]] constellations. | Satellites operating in the [[ITU Frequency Bands|Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)]] offer the advantage of simple receivers and antennas, with plausible connectivity between the satellite and a handheld or other [[portable]] receiver. The disadvantage is that such communications rarely support high data rates, but that is perfectly acceptable in some applications, where short messages are meaningful. Civilian examples include [[Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon]]s (EPIRB), which send short distress messages to the [[COSPAS-SARSAT]] constellations. | ||
Military communications involving primarily text messaging or low-speed facsimile also work well with UHF, not needing complex antennas. Examples include the early [[ | Military communications involving primarily text messaging or low-speed facsimile also work well with UHF, not needing complex antennas. Examples include the early [[United States Navy]] FLTSATCOM, followed by the current [[UHF Follow-On (satellite)|UHF Follow-On (UFO)]] system, which, in turn, will be succeeded by the [[Mobile User Objective System (satellite)|Mobile User Objective System]]. For their particular operating environment, the military can afford additional signal processing that provides more bandwidth, but even they will operate in other frequency ranges when high data rates are needed. | ||
==Orbital tradeoffs== | ==Orbital tradeoffs== | ||
==Advanced features== | ==Advanced features==[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:00, 15 October 2024
Satellite communications include a wide range of technologies and applications that depend on high-altitude electronic relay(s), most often artificial satellites in Earth orbit. The article is not titled "communications satellite", since many applications involve multiple orbiting vehicles, and also a great deal of equipment on Earth. The definition is sufficiently broad to include communications that use communications relay devices operating within the atmosphere, including unmanned aerial vehicles, lighter-than-air devices carrying electronics, or manned aircraft with a primary communications relay function.
Operating frequency tradeoffs
UHF satellites
Satellites operating in the Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) offer the advantage of simple receivers and antennas, with plausible connectivity between the satellite and a handheld or other portable receiver. The disadvantage is that such communications rarely support high data rates, but that is perfectly acceptable in some applications, where short messages are meaningful. Civilian examples include Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB), which send short distress messages to the COSPAS-SARSAT constellations.
Military communications involving primarily text messaging or low-speed facsimile also work well with UHF, not needing complex antennas. Examples include the early United States Navy FLTSATCOM, followed by the current UHF Follow-On (UFO) system, which, in turn, will be succeeded by the Mobile User Objective System. For their particular operating environment, the military can afford additional signal processing that provides more bandwidth, but even they will operate in other frequency ranges when high data rates are needed.
Orbital tradeoffs
==Advanced features==