User:Nick Gardner /Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(286 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<ref>[http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/DETOC/toc_indx.html Alexis de Tocqueville: ''Democracy in America'', ]</ref>
{{AccountNotLive}}
When the members of a community are forced to attend to public affairs, they are necessarily drawn from the circle of their own interests and snatched at times from self-observation. As soon as a man begins to treat of public affairs in public, he begins to perceive that he is not so independent of his fellow men as he had at first imagined, and that in order to obtain their support he must often lend them his co-operation.
==Index and Glossary==
There is an index to the topics dealt with in the economics articles [[Economics/Related Articles|here]], and a glossary of economic terms [[Economics/Glossary|here]].


When the public govern, there is no man who does not feel the value of public goodwill or who does not endeavor to court it by drawing to himself the esteem and affection of those among whom he is to live. Many of the passions which congeal and keep asunder human hearts are then obliged to retire and hide below the surface. Pride must be dissembled; disdain dares not break out; selfishness fears its own self. Under a free government, as most public offices are elective, the men whose elevated minds or aspiring hopes are too closely circumscribed in private life constantly feel that they cannot do without the people who surround them. Men learn at such times to think of their fellow men from ambitious motives; and they frequently find it, in a manner, their interest to forget themselves
See also the [[Politics/Index|'''index to the politics articles ''']].


[[User:Nick_Gardner#Methodology|methodology]]


<ref>[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=879582 Francis Fukuyama: ''Social Capital and Civil Society'', IMF Workng Paper WP/00/74, April 2000]</ref>
{|align="right" cellpadding="10" style="background-color:#FFFFCC; width:40%; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:20px; font-size: 92%;"
Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy in America best elucidated the political function
|"''The European Union is something ...
of social capital in a modern democracy. He used the phrase the "art of association" to
very precious, not only for us in Europe, but also for the rest of the world. Because the European Union is, in fact, the result of a project for peace that brought together nations emerging from the ruins of the Second World War. It was the European Union that united them in peace around the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, justice, rule of law and respect for human rights.''"
describe Americans' propensity for civil association. According to Tocqueville, a modern
democracy tends to wipe away most forms of social class or inherited status that bind people
together in aristocratic societies. Men are left equally free, but weak in their equality since
they are born with no conventional attachments. The vice of modern democracy is to
promote excessive individualism—that is, a preoccupation with one's private life and
family—and an unwillingness to engage in public affairs. Americans combated this tendency
toward excessive individualism by their propensity for voluntary association, which led them
to form groups, both trivial and important, for all aspects of their lives.


Low levels of social capital lead to a number of political dysfunctions, which have
:Merci Olsson, of Nobel Med, congratulating President Barroso on the award of The Nobel Peace Prize t the European Union, 12 October 2012.
been extensively documented. Following Tocqueville's analysis of France, many observers
|}
noted how administrative centralization has led to an excessively rigid and unresponsive
political system, one that can be changed only through antisystemic upsurges such as the
evenements of 1968.7 Low levels of social capital have been linked to an inefficient local
government in southern Italy, as well as to the region's pervasive corruption (Banfield, 1958;
Putnam, 1993). In many Latin American societies, a narrow radius of trust produces a twotier
moral system, with good behavior reserved for family and personal friends, and a
decidedly lower standard of behavior in the public sphere. This serves as a cultural
foundation for corruption, which is often regarded as a legitimate way of looking after one's
family.
It is of course also possible to have too much of a good thing. One person's civic
engagement is another's rent-seeking; much of what constitutes civil society can be described
as interest groups trying to divert public resources to their favored causes, whether sugar-beet
farming, women's health care, or the protection of biodiversity. The public choice literature
has analyzed the baleful consequences of rent-seeking for modern democracies at great
length; Mancur Olson (1982) has argued that Britain's long-term economic decline was due
to the long-term buildup of entrenched interest groups there
   
Putnam. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton Universitiy Press.
* The conclusion, and Putnam's argument that social capital is a necessary ingredient for government functioning. It's a bit unclear on causality here, which he acknowledges: although the differing patterns of social capital in the north and south are largely due to centuries of history (thus dooming the institutional reform, one might think), Putnam also says that the changed institutions will have a gradual (perhaps imperceptible in the short term) effect on improving social capital.
* At the same time, he views social capital as simply one of two equilibria: either societies choose "always defect" in their daily collective action problems, or they choose "always return favors," thus building social capital and general trust. Keep in mind: like all equilibria, these are self-reinforcing. That means that saying institutions cause social capital which reinforces institutions isn't necessarily circular; any equilibrium is circular in that sense, since being in the equilibrium increases the probability that you will stay there.
 
 
 
Ostrom, Elinor, 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press).
 
 
 
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 03:28, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Index and Glossary

There is an index to the topics dealt with in the economics articles here, and a glossary of economic terms here.

See also the index to the politics articles .

methodology

"The European Union is something ... 
very precious, not only for us in Europe, but also for the rest of the world. Because the European Union is, in fact, the result of a project for peace that brought together nations emerging from the ruins of the Second World War. It was the European Union that united them in peace around the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, justice, rule of law and respect for human rights."
Merci Olsson, of Nobel Med, congratulating President Barroso on the award of The Nobel Peace Prize t the European Union, 12 October 2012.
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Nick_Gardner_/Sandbox&oldid=908686"