CZ:Recruitment Letter: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>ZachPruckowski (some minor changes - accept or reject whatever.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Dear colleagues, | Dear colleagues, | ||
We're starting an expert-led alternative to Wikipedia. | We're starting an expert-led alternative to Wikipedia. We feel this is badly needed. And we want your help! | ||
Many academics have a love-hate relationship with Wikipedia. On the one hand, they love the free availability of huge amounts of information. On the other hand, they hate its amateurish quality. | Many academics have a love-hate relationship with Wikipedia. On the one hand, they love the free availability of huge amounts of information. On the other hand, they hate its amateurish quality. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
So, over the past few years we've seen many calls to descend upon Wikipedia and whip articles in a certain area into shape. But when experts do that, though, they tend to get beaten back by an anarchical and somewhat insular Wikipedia community. | So, over the past few years we've seen many calls to descend upon Wikipedia and whip articles in a certain area into shape. But when experts do that, though, they tend to get beaten back by an anarchical and somewhat insular Wikipedia community. | ||
Other groups have proposed, and started, expert-led wiki encyclopedias, with very limited success. It's quite hard to start a successful wiki. There is a serious hurdle to clear: critical mass. If people don't see enough other people working on the wiki, they don't have an incentive to work on it themselves. | |||
Enter the very person who conceived of Wikipedia and got it off the ground in its first year, a Ph.D. philosopher named Larry Sanger. Basically, Larry said: "Enough is enough. We can do better than this." | Enter the very person who conceived of Wikipedia and got it off the ground in its first year, a Ph.D. philosopher named Larry Sanger. Basically, Larry said: "Enough is enough. We can do better than this." | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
http://URL_HERE | http://URL_HERE | ||
If you'd like to sign up to join the pilot project--as an editor *or* a rank-and-file author--then | If you'd like to sign up to join the pilot project--as an editor *or* a rank-and-file author--then please apply here: | ||
http://www.citizendium.org/cfa.html | http://www.citizendium.org/cfa.html |
Revision as of 21:18, 10 November 2006
Dear colleagues,
We're starting an expert-led alternative to Wikipedia. We feel this is badly needed. And we want your help!
Many academics have a love-hate relationship with Wikipedia. On the one hand, they love the free availability of huge amounts of information. On the other hand, they hate its amateurish quality.
So, over the past few years we've seen many calls to descend upon Wikipedia and whip articles in a certain area into shape. But when experts do that, though, they tend to get beaten back by an anarchical and somewhat insular Wikipedia community.
Other groups have proposed, and started, expert-led wiki encyclopedias, with very limited success. It's quite hard to start a successful wiki. There is a serious hurdle to clear: critical mass. If people don't see enough other people working on the wiki, they don't have an incentive to work on it themselves.
Enter the very person who conceived of Wikipedia and got it off the ground in its first year, a Ph.D. philosopher named Larry Sanger. Basically, Larry said: "Enough is enough. We can do better than this."
So the co-founder of Wikipedia is leading the construction of a newer, more mature, expert-led, but still dynamic wiki encyclopedia project, called the Citizendium (sit-ih-ZEN-dee-um), or "the Citizens' Compendium."
It will combine robust public participation with gentle expert guidance and more carefully enforced standards. It has begun life as a fully independent branch (a "fork") of Wikipedia. That means you can edit--or replace--all of those articles you hated on Wikipedia. But we expect it to take on a life of its own and, perhaps, to become the flagship of a new set of responsibly-managed free knowledge projects.
But will it achieve critical mass? There is already excellent evidence that it will. In the first ten days of the pilot project, over 110 Ph.D.-level editors in many fields from around the world activated accounts on the pilot project wiki. There were over 250 total activated accounts in that time, and over 200 articles under development. There were 450 subscribers to Citizendium-L, the main project mailing list, and 1,871 posts to the project forums.
And that's all without reaching out to mailing lists and professional associations. Most academics haven't heard about the Citizendium yet. We think that when they do, many of them will become strong supporters.
We have set up A(N) SUBJECT GROUPNAME HERE editorial group, devoted to organizing Citizendium's work about SUBJECT NAME HERE. We hope you will join us in that group:
If you'd like to sign up to join the pilot project--as an editor *or* a rank-and-file author--then please apply here:
http://www.citizendium.org/cfa.html
Let's show the world what is possible when strong collaboration is gently led by real experts. More importantly, if there are large quantities of information about SUBJECT NAME HERE available online, let's make sure it's of high quality.
SIGNATURE HERE, PREFERABLY FROM SOMEONE IN THE FIELD