User talk:Larry Sanger: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger mNo edit summary |
imported>D. Matt Innis (just a heads up) |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Thanks. Just the ones that are listed under "Important Notes" (and elsewhere on that page maybe). --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 07:37, 19 February 2007 (CST) | Thanks. Just the ones that are listed under "Important Notes" (and elsewhere on that page maybe). --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 07:37, 19 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:I see the ones you caught. I think I would have caught the Jewish one and thank goodness on [[Justice]] somebody else got there after you. [[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 08:51, 19 February 2007 (CST) | :I see the ones you caught. I think I would have caught the Jewish one and thank goodness on [[Justice]] somebody else got there after you. [[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 08:51, 19 February 2007 (CST) | ||
== just a heads up == | |||
You might want to see this conversation.[http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:D._Matt_Innis#Careful_with_the_U.27s.3F] [[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 12:29, 19 February 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 12:29, 19 February 2007
Archive, project start through Jan. 2007
Archive, Jan.-Feb. 2007
Constabulary blocking procedure
Currently, one point reads:
- Uploading of copyrighted material.
I believe this should read "Unauthorized uploading of copyrighted material" or something to that effect.
For example, if I take a photograph, I am the copyright owner of the photo (automatic since 1976). If I then upload the photo to CZ and license it cc-by-sa (as an example), I am still the copyright owner. The licensing does not transfer or surrender the copyright. The license provides usage rights under the terms of the license. I retain the copyright. In fact, almost all material which is uploaded to CZ is copyrighted. James F. Perry 09:51, 16 February 2007 (CST)
Right you are. --Larry Sanger 09:52, 16 February 2007 (CST)
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
David, I have sent your complaint to constables@citizendium.org.
OK
I only created those cats that already had members - as I thought the red links looked unprofessional. I wont do anymore, sorry Iva 14:01, 17 February 2007 (CST)
It's not unprofessional to have work to do. ;-) --Larry Sanger 14:02, 17 February 2007 (CST)
The Big SD
Larry, I added to the page
NOTE 4: don't delete recently created placeholder articles (usually just a title), created to "de-orphan" an article.
Please remove if I am mistaken.
Stephen Ewen 19:13, 17 February 2007 (CST)
No, sounds right to me. --Larry Sanger 19:20, 17 February 2007 (CST)
1911 Brittanica material
I see in the del log you have encountered a few of these by Ori, too. I have been leaving them alone (e.g., Edmond François Valentin About) when not imported from WP (and hence mixed with WP stuff), even though they were not being actively transformed. Stephen Ewen 22:36, 17 February 2007 (CST)
Template Root
That's what I was afraid of, besides, manually adding new templates would get old after a while. --Paul Derry 16:45, 18 February 2007 (CST)
Sir Michael Hardie Boys
Those categories are in relation to what Sir Michael is. There are other people from New Zealand who are jurists and judges, but there are very few people today that are retired Governors-General of New Zealand. He's the only guy I know who has served as a Judge of the Kiribati Court of Appeal. I know the man personally, as I served under him whenever he needed me (on a part-time basis) from when I was 20 until 3 months after my 24th birthday. - (Aidan Work 19:50, 18 February 2007 (CST))
Well done. But none of this bears on the question whether we should be creating large numbers of arbitrary, contextless categories (i.e., social tagging). I don't think so. --Larry Sanger 19:52, 18 February 2007 (CST)
If we remove CZ Live Tag
If we remove CZ Live tag like proposed here: "The result will be a more honest representation of what we’ve done. Also, if we do a good job with this deletion, we can then remove “CZ Live” tags from our active articles, because all articles that are in our database will be CZ Live!"
Then how will we see a list of all of the articles on CZ? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 00:01, 19 February 2007 (CST)
Just look at "Special:allpages" or that's what I had in mind. I'm not sure, though, because as I've gone through a lot of the articles I've seen that many of these are redirection pages, or whatever. Hand-maintaining a list of "Live articles" might turn out to be a pretty good idea... --Larry Sanger 07:39, 19 February 2007 (CST)
Careful with the Js
Roger that. I've found a couple, too. If there looks like there has been any recent activity, I take off the SD tag and leave a note to let the editors decide. Is there a criteria for keeping that you especially want me to watch for (i.e. snakes)? Matt Innis (Talk) 06:40, 19 February 2007 (CST)
Thanks. Just the ones that are listed under "Important Notes" (and elsewhere on that page maybe). --Larry Sanger 07:37, 19 February 2007 (CST)
- I see the ones you caught. I think I would have caught the Jewish one and thank goodness on Justice somebody else got there after you. Matt Innis (Talk) 08:51, 19 February 2007 (CST)
just a heads up
You might want to see this conversation.[1] Matt Innis (Talk) 12:29, 19 February 2007 (CST)