User:Marielle Fields Newsome: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Marielle Fields Newsome
No edit summary
imported>Marielle Fields Newsome
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
I decided to take this write-a-thon to put in entries for every order in the class [[Insecta]].  It has been a total source nightmare.  I started with Peterson's Field Guide.  I got to the order [[Orthoptera]]... and it included [[cockroaches]]!  Good lord.  The last time I checked, cockroaches were in their own order (and there was a 2007 paper suggesting they should actually be a suborder in [[Isoptera]], but the dust hasn't settled on that yet).  And then I realized that despite the fact that I bought the field guide in my teenage years, it hadn't been updated since 1970.  So I brought out my Nat'l Audubon Society Field Guide, which is copyright 1995.  Better, but a lot has changed.  
I decided to take this write-a-thon to put in entries for every order in the class [[Insecta]].  It has been a total source nightmare.  I started with Peterson's Field Guide.  I got to the order [[Orthoptera]]... and it included [[cockroaches]]!  Good lord.  The last time I checked, cockroaches were in their own order (and there was a 2007 paper suggesting they should actually be a suborder in [[Isoptera]], but the dust hasn't settled on that yet).  And then I realized that despite the fact that I bought the field guide in my teenage years, it hadn't been updated since 1970.  So I brought out my Nat'l Audubon Society Field Guide, which is copyright 1995.  Better, but a lot has changed.  


After all that, I discovered [http://www.itis.gov/ ITIS]. As it claims to be an authority, I will be using that.[[User:Marielle Fields Newsome|Marielle Fields Newsome]] 16:59, 4 June 2008 (CDT)
After all that, I discovered [http://www.itis.gov/ ITIS]. As it claims to be an authority, I will be using that. I notice that wikipedia uses quite recent material in their classification, but I'm hesitant to do that, mostly because taxonomy is often interdependent.  [[User:Marielle Fields Newsome|Marielle Fields Newsome]] 16:59, 4 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:15, 4 June 2008

I am an Ph.D. student in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI. I graduated with Honors in Biological Sciences with a concentration in Neurobiology and Behavior from Cornell University in Ithaca, NY in May 2008.

My primary interest in contributing to the Citizendium is in the field of animal behavior; however, I've contributed to articles on Wikipedia in other areas of biology, chemistry, and physics, and expect to do so here as well. I am also interested in scientific classification. My organisms of choice generally belong to the class Insecta. As for nonscientific interests, anime, manga, and other aspects of Japanese popular culture are a hobby of mine. I am also an avid reader of both fiction and non fiction.

Current Projects

I decided to take this write-a-thon to put in entries for every order in the class Insecta. It has been a total source nightmare. I started with Peterson's Field Guide. I got to the order Orthoptera... and it included cockroaches! Good lord. The last time I checked, cockroaches were in their own order (and there was a 2007 paper suggesting they should actually be a suborder in Isoptera, but the dust hasn't settled on that yet). And then I realized that despite the fact that I bought the field guide in my teenage years, it hadn't been updated since 1970. So I brought out my Nat'l Audubon Society Field Guide, which is copyright 1995. Better, but a lot has changed.

After all that, I discovered ITIS. As it claims to be an authority, I will be using that. I notice that wikipedia uses quite recent material in their classification, but I'm hesitant to do that, mostly because taxonomy is often interdependent. Marielle Fields Newsome 16:59, 4 June 2008 (CDT)