Talk:Peanuts: Difference between revisions
imported>Joshua David Williams (no longer a stub; also replied to Eric Winesett) |
imported>Joshua David Williams No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:I'll take a look at the tenses and see if I can fix it. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | :I'll take a look at the tenses and see if I can fix it. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
I've fixed the tenses up a bit. As for the exact awards, I'll have to do some research. I know several of the films won several awards as well. | |||
The article had quite a few extra spaces in it, as though it was written in vi. We're using quite a few parenthesis right now. I think we need to re-word those sections a little bit to make it easier to read. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 11:47, 10 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:47, 10 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Literature Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Joshua David Williams 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Some issues
Right now the first sentence is in present tense, while the rest in past tense. There should probably be some explanation that Peanuts is still in syndication, but there are no new strips being made. However the tense should be consistent. Also, instead of calling it "a popular, multiple award-winning comic strip," there should be verifiable statements to that effect in the article (what awards?). --Eric Winesett 11:29, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'll take a look at the tenses and see if I can fix it. --Joshua David Williams 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
I've fixed the tenses up a bit. As for the exact awards, I'll have to do some research. I know several of the films won several awards as well.
The article had quite a few extra spaces in it, as though it was written in vi. We're using quite a few parenthesis right now. I think we need to re-word those sections a little bit to make it easier to read. --Joshua David Williams 11:47, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
- Literature Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Literature Advanced Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Literature Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Literature Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Literature External Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Literature Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup