Talk:Compiler: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (suggest merging Optimatization into Compiler for now) |
imported>Pat Palmer (do we need history of compilers? and a bit about references) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=shall we merge in Optimization for now?= | =shall we merge in Optimization for now?= | ||
[[Optimization_%28computer_science%29]] seems like it really ought to be merged back into [[compiler]], at least for now, since it is just a stub. We could always split them again if both get too large. As it stands, though, we run the risk of getting duplication information in two articles if they are kept separate.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 03:45, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | [[Optimization_%28computer_science%29]] seems like it really ought to be merged back into [[compiler]], at least for now, since it is just a stub. We could always split them again if both get too large. As it stands, though, we run the risk of getting duplication information in two articles if they are kept separate.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 03:45, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
=we need a section (or an article?) on history of compilers= | |||
The first compiler was ''such'' a breakthough. Assemblers and compilers used to be difficult. Nowadays, they are much better understood (but the formalisms behind them were not always so well understood). There's a story there.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
=we need references= | |||
Does anyone have the Aho/Ullman book around (or whatever people are reading these days instead)? If so, the article would benefit it we could cite it (and some others) as references for specific parts of this article.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 03:21, 9 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Pat Palmer 03:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
note on article split
I have split this article away from translation system.Pat Palmer 03:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
shall we merge in Optimization for now?
Optimization_(computer_science) seems like it really ought to be merged back into compiler, at least for now, since it is just a stub. We could always split them again if both get too large. As it stands, though, we run the risk of getting duplication information in two articles if they are kept separate.Pat Palmer 03:45, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
we need a section (or an article?) on history of compilers
The first compiler was such a breakthough. Assemblers and compilers used to be difficult. Nowadays, they are much better understood (but the formalisms behind them were not always so well understood). There's a story there.Pat Palmer 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
we need references
Does anyone have the Aho/Ullman book around (or whatever people are reading these days instead)? If so, the article would benefit it we could cite it (and some others) as references for specific parts of this article.Pat Palmer 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Mathematics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Mathematics Cleanup
- Cleanup