Talk:Octonions: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(i=0 ??)
imported>Ragnar Schroder
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


SHould the formula be i=0 under the sigma?  [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 04:10, 19 December 2007 (CST)
SHould the formula be i=0 under the sigma?  [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 04:10, 19 December 2007 (CST)
:The formula is botched,  I'll fix it.  Thanx :-)  [[User:Ragnar Schroder|Ragnar Schroder]] 04:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 04:27, 19 December 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A nonassociative and noncommutative extension of the quaternions. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

SHould the formula be i=0 under the sigma? Richard Jensen 04:10, 19 December 2007 (CST)

The formula is botched, I'll fix it. Thanx :-) Ragnar Schroder 04:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)