Talk:Exponent: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
m (Added an unsigned template and posted a response.)
imported>Barry R. Smith
Line 5: Line 5:
Is there a special cause for using <math>5\times 5</math> instead of <math>5 \cdot 5</math> ? [[User:Alexander Wiebel|Alexander Wiebel]] 15:10, 3 July 2008 (CDT)
Is there a special cause for using <math>5\times 5</math> instead of <math>5 \cdot 5</math> ? [[User:Alexander Wiebel|Alexander Wiebel]] 15:10, 3 July 2008 (CDT)


: Is there a special cause for using <math>5 \cdot 5</math> instead of <math>5 \times 5</math>?  As the variable "x" does not yet appear on the page, I don't see a cause for confusion.  On the other hand, <math>\times</math> appears as more substantial and visible than <math>\cdot</math>


== Maturity of the definition ==
== Maturity of the definition ==

Revision as of 18:59, 2 December 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A mathematical notation used to represent the operation of exponentiation. It is usually written as a superscript on a number or variable, called the base. For example, in the expression, the base is 5 and the exponent is 4. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Cross vs. dot

Is there a special cause for using instead of  ? Alexander Wiebel 15:10, 3 July 2008 (CDT)

Is there a special cause for using instead of ? As the variable "x" does not yet appear on the page, I don't see a cause for confusion. On the other hand, appears as more substantial and visible than

Maturity of the definition

At the request of a fellow Citizen, I am rewording the first sentence to sound more sophisticated -- I agree with him that the present version sounds like it is geared towards a child, rather than an undergraduate. ...said Barry R. Smith (talk) 14:24, October 26, 2008

I agree most emphatically with Barry's rewording. Milton Beychok 23:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)