Fuzzy subset: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giangiacomo Gerla
imported>Giangiacomo Gerla
Line 9: Line 9:


== Some set-theoretical notions for fuzzy subsets ==
== Some set-theoretical notions for fuzzy subsets ==
In classical mathematics the definitions of union, intersection and complement are related with the interpretation of the basic logical connectives <math>\vee, \wedge, \neg</math>. In order to define the same operations for fuzzy subsets, we have to fix a multi-valued logic and therefore suitable operations <math> \oplus, \otimes</math>, '''-''' to interprete these logical connectives. In fac, the union, intersection and complement are defined by setting
In classical mathematics the definitions of union, intersection and complement are related with the interpretation of the basic logical connectives <math>\vee, \wedge, \neg</math>. In order to define the same operations for fuzzy subsets, we have to fix a multi-valued logic and therefore suitable operations <math> \oplus, \otimes</math>, '''-''' to interprete these connectives. In such a case, se set


<math>(s\cup t)(x) = s(x)\oplus t(x)</math>,  
<math>(s\cup t)(x) = s(x)\oplus t(x)</math>,  

Revision as of 23:40, 28 June 2007

The notion of fuzzy subset

Given a subset X of a set S its characteristic function is the map such that if and only if x is an element in X. The notion of fuzzy subset is obtained by substituting the Boolean algebra {0,1} with the complete lattice [0,1]. In other words, a fuzzy subset is a characteristic function in which graded truth values are admitted. The following is a precise definition


Definition Given a nonempty set S, a fuzzy subset of S is a map s from S into the interval [0,1].

The idea is that such a notion enables us to represent the extension of predicates and relations as "big","slow", "near" "similar", which are vague in nature. Indeed, the elements in [0,1] are interpreted as truth values and, in accordance, for every x in S, the value s(x) is interpreted as the membership degree of x to s.

Some set-theoretical notions for fuzzy subsets

In classical mathematics the definitions of union, intersection and complement are related with the interpretation of the basic logical connectives . In order to define the same operations for fuzzy subsets, we have to fix a multi-valued logic and therefore suitable operations , - to interprete these connectives. In such a case, se set

,

,

.

In Zadeh's original papers the operations , - are defined by setting for every x and y in [0,1]:

= min(x, y)

= max(x,y)

= 1-x.

Several authors prefer to consider different operations, as an example to assume that is a triangular norm and that is the corresponding triangular co-norm.

An extension of these definitions to the general case in which instead of [0,1] we consider different algebraic structures is obvious.

Fuzzy logic and probability

Many peoples compare fuzzy logic with probability theory since both refer to the interval [0,1]. However, they are conceptually distinct since we have not confuse a degree of truth with a probability measure. To illustrate the difference, consider the following example: Let be the claim "the rose on the table is red" and imagine we can freely examine the rose (complete knowledge) but, as a matter of fact, the color looks not exactly red. Then is neither fully true nor fully false and we can express that by assigning to a truth value, as an example 0.8, different from 0 and 1 (fuzziness). This truth value does not depend on the information we have since this information is complete.

Now, imagine a world in which all the roses are either clearly red or clearly yellow. In such a world is either true or false but, inasmuch as we cannot examine the rose on the table, we are not able to know what is the case. Nevertheless, we have an opinion about the possible color of that rose and we could assign to a number, as an example 0.8, as a subjective measure of our degree of belief in (probability). In such a case this number depends strongly from the information we have and, for example, it can vary if we have some new information on the taste of the possessor of the rose.

See also

Bibliography

  • Cox E., The Fuzzy Systems Handbook (1994), ISBN 0-12-194270-8
  • Elkan C.. The Paradoxical Success of Fuzzy Logic. November 1993. Available from Elkan's home page.
  • Hájek P., Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer 1998.
  • Höppner F., Klawonn F., Kruse R. and Runkler T., Fuzzy Cluster Analysis (1999), ISBN 0-471-98864-2.
  • Klir G. and Folger T., Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information (1988), ISBN 0-13-345984-5.
  • Klir G. , UTE H. St. Clair and Bo Yuan Fuzzy Set Theory Foundations and Applications,1997.
  • Klir G. and Bo Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic (1995) ISBN 0-13-101171-5
  • Bart Kosko, Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic (1993), Hyperion. ISBN 0-7868-8021-X
  • Novák V., Perfilieva I, Mockor J., Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, (1999).
  • Yager R. and Filev D., Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control (1994), ISBN 0-471-01761-2
  • Zimmermann H., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications (2001), ISBN 0-7923-7435-5.
  • Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy Sets, ‘’Information and Control’’, 8 (1965) 338­353.