Talk:Tennis/Catalogs/World No. 1 male players: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Hayford Peirce
(changed status)
Line 5: Line 5:
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check =  
|          cat_check =  
|              status = 3
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 12:47, 4 July 2007 (CDT)}}
|                  by = [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 12:47, 4 July 2007 (CDT)}}

Revision as of 11:17, 22 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Tennis/Catalogs/World No. 1 male players"
Workgroup category or categories Sports Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Hayford Peirce 12:47, 4 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article states that it will be a catalog of players that have been World No. 1 for a year, but what about the players that have been No. 1 for less than a year? --Charles Sandberg 16:29, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

That question doesn't arise until around 1972 or so, when the ATP started weekly rankings. WP had long articles about the ATP ratings. I then started a No. 1 World article, like the one here, but only up to 1972. Other people then continued it but I dropped out. With this one I don't plan to go any further than 1968 (start of Open play) or 1972 at the latest. It probably should be renamed at some point. Hayford Peirce 16:46, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

Note, we won't have to use repetitive "catalog of" this and that under the subpage proposal. This article, for example, could live at Tennis/Tables/World No. 1 male tennis players. --Larry Sanger 16:40, 8 July 2007 (CDT)