Talk:Space debris: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
imported>Carl Jantzen No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==7/15 Weekly Wiki Responses== | |||
Hi Carl, just popped in to say this is quite a good article since you were asking a comment. I don't know much about the subject, but you manage to give a good clear overview of the topic. Informative and concise; a good combination :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 10:22, 15 August 2007 (CDT) | Hi Carl, just popped in to say this is quite a good article since you were asking a comment. I don't know much about the subject, but you manage to give a good clear overview of the topic. Informative and concise; a good combination :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 10:22, 15 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
[[Space debris]] looks good, and is an improvement over the Wikipedia article in several places, but the WP article appears to have gained a section about "Significant debris impact events" which is very interesting, since that's exactly the sort of thing people are worried about space debris for. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:37, 15 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
:I actually removed that section from this article because I felt that most of the sources were either unreliable or contradicted each other. When I get the chance I'm going to re-review the sources and do some googling to see if there is any real research suggesting those events were debris-related. --[[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 10:45, 15 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:45, 15 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Astronomy Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Carl Jantzen 13:37, 9 July 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
7/15 Weekly Wiki Responses
Hi Carl, just popped in to say this is quite a good article since you were asking a comment. I don't know much about the subject, but you manage to give a good clear overview of the topic. Informative and concise; a good combination :-) Denis Cavanagh 10:22, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
Space debris looks good, and is an improvement over the Wikipedia article in several places, but the WP article appears to have gained a section about "Significant debris impact events" which is very interesting, since that's exactly the sort of thing people are worried about space debris for. --Larry Sanger 10:37, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
- I actually removed that section from this article because I felt that most of the sources were either unreliable or contradicted each other. When I get the chance I'm going to re-review the sources and do some googling to see if there is any real research suggesting those events were debris-related. --Carl Jantzen 10:45, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Astronomy Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Astronomy Advanced Articles
- Astronomy Nonstub Articles
- Astronomy Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Astronomy Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Astronomy Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Astronomy Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Astronomy External Articles
- Astronomy Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Astronomy Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup