Talk:Internet troll: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Bruce M. Tindall No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::::That would require that each subpage has its own namespace? Is that even on the table? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 22:30, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | :::::That would require that each subpage has its own namespace? Is that even on the table? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 22:30, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Psychology of== | |||
I understand (I think) that Citizendium tries not to fetishize footnotes, since "the devil can cite scripture for his purpose," <ref> Antonio, in ''The Merchant of Venice,'' Act I, scene 3 [oops, sorry, pardon my footnote...] </ref> and we don't have a "Citation Needed" template, etc. But I wondered whether I could possibly request some citations for the sections of this article that create a category of people and then proceed to make psychological generalizations about them. Those sections contain passages inside quotation marks, and apparently they were created by an author-constable with very serious academic credentials, so would it be possible to supply a source for those assertions? Just another newbie author poking fingers at the perimiters (not parameters!) of Citizendium's policies. Thanks. [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 18:52, 28 November 2007 (CST) | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> |
Revision as of 19:52, 28 November 2007
Should live at Internet troll. -- One of my favorite subjects. :-) --Larry Sanger 21:54, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- Now thats cool. The metadata template name got changed as part of the move along with the talk page! How long has it been that way? Can we get it to do the approval and unused subpages as well? Chris Day (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- I'm no mediwiki guru, but if talk pages can be made to cascade with articles, then it seem it would not be too much trouble to make any number of pages cascade. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 22:08, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- I would guess, however, that the syntax would have to change, e.g., Bibliography:Internet troll. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 22:20, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
Psychology of
I understand (I think) that Citizendium tries not to fetishize footnotes, since "the devil can cite scripture for his purpose," [1] and we don't have a "Citation Needed" template, etc. But I wondered whether I could possibly request some citations for the sections of this article that create a category of people and then proceed to make psychological generalizations about them. Those sections contain passages inside quotation marks, and apparently they were created by an author-constable with very serious academic credentials, so would it be possible to supply a source for those assertions? Just another newbie author poking fingers at the perimiters (not parameters!) of Citizendium's policies. Thanks. Bruce M.Tindall 18:52, 28 November 2007 (CST)
References
- ↑ Antonio, in The Merchant of Venice, Act I, scene 3 [oops, sorry, pardon my footnote...]
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Psychology Developing Articles
- Psychology Nonstub Articles
- Psychology Internal Articles
- Law Developing Articles
- Law Nonstub Articles
- Law Internal Articles