Talk:Obesity: Difference between revisions
imported>Celine Caquineau |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (→Regarding removal of abstracts & excerpts from citation: new section) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Intro== | ==Intro== | ||
This article needs a lede/intro. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:13, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | This article needs a lede/intro. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:13, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
== Regarding removal of abstracts & excerpts from citation == | |||
Robert, I must express how sad I feel about your removal of abstracts and excerpts that I had included for some of the citations. My comments: | |||
Your stated reason for removing them, the warning about article length. I did not know that CZ imposes a limit on article length. Can you direct me to the warning site. | |||
I used to see warnings about some browsers unable to handle articles beyond a certain byte number. I have looked at very long articles in the following browsers: IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera -- none of which had trouble displaying very long articles. I will test further by creating a humongus article in a sandbox. | |||
Including abstracts, or portions of them, and excerpts, and explanatory notes, in the 'Reference' section, gives the readers extra value, if they want it, without disturbing the flow of the text in the main article. Extra value in the form of information, enriching the article. Abstracts and excerpts help the reader to decide whether to consult the citation, perhaps encouraging her to do so, CZ thereby enhancing its pedagogical goal. | |||
If the lengths of the abstracts/excerpts put you off, I'd gladly shorten them, but I'd rather give the reader more than less and at the same time obviate her need to leave the CZ article to consult the original citation, perhaps at least delaying it until she's finished reading the main CZ article. | |||
Personally, I'd like to include at least a short annotation for every citation listed, as extra informational value for the reader. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 17:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:39, 25 January 2010
Eduzendium
Just to let you know that several themes related to appetite and obesity will be developed by students as part of an Eduzendium project from september until december 09 (U00984) Appetite and Obesity, University of Edinburgh 2009. Celine Caquineau 16:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Disambig
Would Fat (body mass) be an inappropriate redirect? --Robert W King 23:08, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- Wouldn't Body mass index be more appropriate? And actually, it sounds like it should be a separate article. Chris Day (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
Intro
This article needs a lede/intro. --Robert W King 09:13, 13 March 2008 (CDT)
Regarding removal of abstracts & excerpts from citation
Robert, I must express how sad I feel about your removal of abstracts and excerpts that I had included for some of the citations. My comments:
Your stated reason for removing them, the warning about article length. I did not know that CZ imposes a limit on article length. Can you direct me to the warning site.
I used to see warnings about some browsers unable to handle articles beyond a certain byte number. I have looked at very long articles in the following browsers: IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera -- none of which had trouble displaying very long articles. I will test further by creating a humongus article in a sandbox.
Including abstracts, or portions of them, and excerpts, and explanatory notes, in the 'Reference' section, gives the readers extra value, if they want it, without disturbing the flow of the text in the main article. Extra value in the form of information, enriching the article. Abstracts and excerpts help the reader to decide whether to consult the citation, perhaps encouraging her to do so, CZ thereby enhancing its pedagogical goal.
If the lengths of the abstracts/excerpts put you off, I'd gladly shorten them, but I'd rather give the reader more than less and at the same time obviate her need to leave the CZ article to consult the original citation, perhaps at least delaying it until she's finished reading the main CZ article.
Personally, I'd like to include at least a short annotation for every citation listed, as extra informational value for the reader. Anthony.Sebastian 17:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Biology Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles