Carmichael number: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch
imported>Jitse Niesen
Line 11: Line 11:


[[J. Chernick]] found in 1939 a way to construct Carmichael numbers<ref>J. Chernick, "On Fermat's simple theorem", ''Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.'' '''45''' (1939) 269-274</ref>
[[J. Chernick]] found in 1939 a way to construct Carmichael numbers<ref>J. Chernick, "On Fermat's simple theorem", ''Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.'' '''45''' (1939) 269-274</ref>
<ref>[http://home.att.net/~numericana/answer/modular.htm#carmichael (2003-11-22) Generic Carmichael Numbers]</ref>. If, for a natural number ''n'', the three numbers <math>\scriptstyle 6n+1\ </math>, <math>\scriptstyle 12n+1\ </math> and <math>\scriptstyle 18n+1\ </math> are prime numbers, the product <math>\scriptstyle M_3(n) = (6n+1)\cdot (12n+1)\cdot (18n+1)</math> is a Carmichael number. Equivalent to this is that if <math>\scriptstyle m\ </math>, <math>\scriptstyle 2m-1\ </math> and <math>\scriptstyle 3m-2</math> are prime numbers, then the product <math>\scriptstyle m\cdot (2m-1)\cdot (3m-2)</math> is a Carmichael number.
<ref>[http://home.att.net/~numericana/answer/modular.htm#carmichael (2003-11-22) Generic Carmichael Numbers]</ref>. If, for a natural number ''n'', the three numbers <math>\scriptstyle 6n+1\ </math>, <math>\scriptstyle 12n+1\ </math> and <math>\scriptstyle 18n+1\ </math> are prime numbers, the product <math>\scriptstyle M_3(n) = (6n+1)\cdot (12n+1)\cdot (18n+1)</math> is a Carmichael number. This condition can only be satisfied if the number <math>n\ </math> ends with 0, 1, 5 or 6. An equivalent formulation of Chernick's construction is that if <math>\scriptstyle m\ </math>, <math>\scriptstyle 2m-1\ </math> and <math>\scriptstyle 3m-2</math> are prime numbers, then the product <math>\scriptstyle m\cdot (2m-1)\cdot (3m-2)</math> is a Carmichael number.


To construct Carmichael numbers with <math>\scriptstyle M_3(n) = (6n+1)\cdot (12n+1)\cdot (18n+1)</math>, you could only use numbers <math>n\ </math> which ends with 0, 1, 5 or 6.
This way to construct Carmichael numbers may be extended<ref>Paulo Ribenboim, ''The new book of prime number records'', Springer-Verlag (1996) ISBN 0-387-94457-5.  P.120</ref> to
 
This way to construct Carmichael numbers mey be extended<ref>Paulo Ribenboim, ''The new book of prime number records'', Springer-Verlag (1996) ISBN 0-387-94457-5.  P.120</ref> to


:<math>M_k(n)=(6n+1)(12n+1)\prod_{i=1}^{k-2}(9\cdot 2^i n+1) \, </math>  
:<math>M_k(n)=(6n+1)(12n+1)\prod_{i=1}^{k-2}(9\cdot 2^i n+1) \, </math>  

Revision as of 06:26, 28 October 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Code [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A Carmichael number is a composite number named after the mathematician Robert Daniel Carmichael. A Carmichael number divides for every integer . A Carmichael number c also satisfies the congruence , if . The first few Carmichael numbers are 561, 1105, 1729, 2465, 2821, 6601 and 8911. In 1994 Pomerance, Alford and Granville proved that there exist infinitely many Carmichael numbers.

Properties

  • Every Carmichael number is square-free and has at least three different prime factors
  • For every Carmichael number c it holds that is divisible by for every one of its prime factors .
  • Every absolute Euler pseudoprime is a Carmichael number.

Chernick's Carmichael numbers

J. Chernick found in 1939 a way to construct Carmichael numbers[1] [2]. If, for a natural number n, the three numbers , and are prime numbers, the product is a Carmichael number. This condition can only be satisfied if the number ends with 0, 1, 5 or 6. An equivalent formulation of Chernick's construction is that if , and are prime numbers, then the product is a Carmichael number.

This way to construct Carmichael numbers may be extended[3] to

with the condition that each of the factors is prime and that is divisible by .

Distribution of Carmichael numbers

Let C(X) denote the number of Carmichael numbers less than or equal to X. Then for all sufficiently large X

The upper bound is due to Erdős(1956)[4] and Pomerance, Selfridge and Wagstaff (1980)[5] and the lower bound is due to Alford, Granville and Pomerance (1994)[6]. The asymptotic rate of growth of C(X) is not known.[7]

References and notes

  1. J. Chernick, "On Fermat's simple theorem", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1939) 269-274
  2. (2003-11-22) Generic Carmichael Numbers
  3. Paulo Ribenboim, The new book of prime number records, Springer-Verlag (1996) ISBN 0-387-94457-5. P.120
  4. Paul Erdős, "On pseudoprimes and Carmichael numbers", Publ. Math. Debrecen 4 (1956) 201-206. MR 18 18
  5. C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge and S.S. Wagstaff jr, "The pseudoprimes to 25.109", Math. Comp. 35 (1980) 1003-1026. MR 82g:10030
  6. W. R. Alford, A. Granville, and C. Pomerance. "There are Infinitely Many Carmichael Numbers", Annals of Mathematics 139 (1994) 703-722. MR 95k:11114
  7. Richard Guy, "Unsolved problems in Number Theory" (3rd ed), Springer-Verlag (2004) ISBN 0-387-20860-7. Section A13