Talk:Portuguese cuisine/Catalogs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (I was just trying to make it consistent within the Cuisine/Catalogs page) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Or a catalog in the article [[Portugese cuisine]]. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 05:26, 5 November 2007 (CST) | :Or a catalog in the article [[Portugese cuisine]]. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 05:26, 5 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::Definitely the latter:-) --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 07:20, 5 November 2007 (CST) | ::Definitely the latter:-) --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 07:20, 5 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:::Geez, I don't understand a bit of the above. I just made this to fit in with all the other catalogs in [[Cuisine/Catalogs]]. Although I freely admit that all of those other might need changing/renaming also. This whole Catalog/Subpages/Catalogs-within-Catalogs is beyond me! But I'll let you gentlemen do whatever you want with them. The key, though, is *consistency*. If Portugese cuisine catalog is renamed, then Austrian, Belgian, Chinese, etc., should be too.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 10:36, 5 November 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 10:36, 5 November 2007
Should this not be Catalog of Portuguese Catalogs? --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:40, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Or a catalog in the article Portugese cuisine. Chris Day (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Definitely the latter:-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:20, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Geez, I don't understand a bit of the above. I just made this to fit in with all the other catalogs in Cuisine/Catalogs. Although I freely admit that all of those other might need changing/renaming also. This whole Catalog/Subpages/Catalogs-within-Catalogs is beyond me! But I'll let you gentlemen do whatever you want with them. The key, though, is *consistency*. If Portugese cuisine catalog is renamed, then Austrian, Belgian, Chinese, etc., should be too.... Hayford Peirce 10:36, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Definitely the latter:-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:20, 5 November 2007 (CST)