Politics/Approval: Difference between revisions
< Politics
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Create subpage containing {{subpages}} (details)) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (AM decision) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Approval Manager== | |||
This otherwise excellent article on Politics fails to achieve Approval status because of deficiencies of the lede, which the group comments do not resolve. | |||
The main problem with the lede: It does not provide a natural, coherent flow to the sections that follow. The narrative does not flow. Which of the various meanings of the word 'politics' should the reader expect the article to focus on? The lede does not speak to that. When the word appears in the main text, will the reader have in mind her own preconceived idea of its meaning, or does the lede provide for that? | |||
I suggest putting the article back to draft until a satisfactory lede develops. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 23:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:57, 21 December 2012
Approval Manager
This otherwise excellent article on Politics fails to achieve Approval status because of deficiencies of the lede, which the group comments do not resolve.
The main problem with the lede: It does not provide a natural, coherent flow to the sections that follow. The narrative does not flow. Which of the various meanings of the word 'politics' should the reader expect the article to focus on? The lede does not speak to that. When the word appears in the main text, will the reader have in mind her own preconceived idea of its meaning, or does the lede provide for that?
I suggest putting the article back to draft until a satisfactory lede develops. Anthony.Sebastian 23:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)