Talk:Royal Navy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>George Swan
(subpages)
 
imported>David Finn
(→‎Globe: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Globe ==
I am not sure that the picture of the globe is all that useful, especially as it does not show where Britain is in relation to the Falklands or provide any visual representation of the course or actions of either fleet. Argentina isn't even named... Wouldn't this be better at the [[Falklands War]] article?
:Note: The image is already at the Falklands War article, where it adds a nice visual element, but as I stated provides limited information for the reader. Having it in this article seems superfluous so I will go ahead and remove it - see what you think and, of course, if there is some other reason for having it or you think the removal detracts from the article greatly then please restore it. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 08:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:55, 20 August 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition By long naval tradition, when there is no qualifier but "Royal", the navy being discussed is that of the United Kingdom. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Military [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Royal Navy
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Globe

I am not sure that the picture of the globe is all that useful, especially as it does not show where Britain is in relation to the Falklands or provide any visual representation of the course or actions of either fleet. Argentina isn't even named... Wouldn't this be better at the Falklands War article?

Note: The image is already at the Falklands War article, where it adds a nice visual element, but as I stated provides limited information for the reader. Having it in this article seems superfluous so I will go ahead and remove it - see what you think and, of course, if there is some other reason for having it or you think the removal detracts from the article greatly then please restore it. David Finn 08:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)