Sine: Difference between revisions
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov (Should we copypast here also the "deduction" from the Euclidean geometry?) |
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov m (→Bracketing) |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
::: <math> - x^2/2 < \cos(x)-\cos(0) < -x^2/2 + x^3/6 </math> | ::: <math> - x^2/2 < \cos(x)-\cos(0) < -x^2/2 + x^3/6 </math> | ||
: (12) <math> 1- x^2/2 < \cos(x)< 1 -x^2/2 + x^4/24 </math> | : (12) <math> 1- x^2/2 < \cos(x)< 1 -x^2/2 + x^4/24 </math> | ||
Continuing this exercise, one can obtain more and more narrow bounds for values of sin and cos. | Continuing this exercise, one can obtain more and more narrow bounds for values of sin and cos. | ||
However, even equations (9,12) are sufficient to see that both both sin and cos remain positive while, the argument is within (0,1) range. | |||
This property is used below to reveal periodicity of these funcitons. | |||
==Mathematical induction== | ==Mathematical induction== |
Revision as of 03:00, 25 May 2008
sine and cosine, or sin and cos are basic trigonometirc functions (which are, in their turn, basic elementary functions), used to express relations between angles and sides of right-angled triangle (or right triangle). These functions are common in science and technology.
Various sources define trigonometric funcitons in different ways.
Geometric approach
In some countries, schoolchildren begin to study]] mathematics with arithmetics, elementary algebra and the Euclidean geometry (planimetry) [1].
Beginning to deal with sin and cos, students already have some idea about "addition" and measurement of angles, segments and areas; they already have accepted the axioms of planimetry, in particular, the Euclid's parallel axiom, and they know the Pythagorean theorem. Therefore, the trigonometric functions are defined as ratios of the lengths of sides of the right-angled triangles, for example, ratio of length of a [[leg(geometry)}|leg]] to that of the hypothenuse.
Geometric approach is described in many sources and, in particular, in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_functions%7Cwikipedia.
The geometrical approach rather assumes properties of sin and cos than deduce them. The assumptions are masked as the geometric axioms. However the deduction of properties of trigonometric functions does not require axioms of geometry. Properties of sin and cos do not depend, for example, on the acceptance of rejection of the Euclid's parallel axiom. Funcitons sin and cos can be defined algebraically, then their properties can be deduced, not postulated. Basic elements of such a deduction are suggested below.
Differential equations
The definitions of derivative and integral does not refer to trigonometric functions, and their basic properties (in particular the Cauchy-Kowalevski theorem of existence and uniqueness of solution of the Cauchy problem) can be deduced without to refer to sin, cos, or any axioms of the Euclidean Geometry. Therefore, the natural way of definition of functions sin and cos uses the differential equation.
Definition. Functions sin and cos are solution of system of equations
- (1)
- (2)
with condition
- (3)
- (4)
(end of definition). Usually, it is assumed, that independent variable is real; in this case, values of functions sin and cos are also real numbers. However, the definition above can be used for complex numbers too.
Such definition does not implies additional concepts about angle and sum of angles; and does not require Pythagorean theorem or even Parallel postulate of the Euclidean geometry. Such a definition does not refer to the concept of number Pi () and therefore can be used for its definition.
However, the naively-obvious properties of sin and cos should be deduced from the system (1)-(4).
Sum of squares
Consider function . From equations (1) and (2) it follows that , i.e., . Evaluation of this constant from equations (2) and (3) gives for all , id est,
- (5)
In this paper, the superscript as indicator of exponentiation is always written after to specify the argument, avoiding the confusions. [2]
For the equation (5) it follows, that for all real values of the functions and are bounded:
- (6)
- (7)
These properties allow efficient bracketing of functions sin and cos.
Bracketing
Consider and in the case . From equation (1) it follows, that . Integration of the last inequality with respect to from 0 to gives: . Using equation (3) we write
- (8) .
Rewrite (8) as and apply equation(2):
Integrating this inequality with respect to from 0 to gives:
Using equation(4) gives
- (9)
The last "<" just follows from equation (7). Using equation (1) gives
- (10)
Integrating equation (12) with respect to from 0 to gives
- (11)
Rewrite it as
and apply equation (2):
Integrating this equation with respect to from 0 to gives
- (12)
Continuing this exercise, one can obtain more and more narrow bounds for values of sin and cos.
However, even equations (9,12) are sufficient to see that both both sin and cos remain positive while, the argument is within (0,1) range. This property is used below to reveal periodicity of these funcitons.
Mathematical induction
Applying the mathematical induction, it is possible to show that for positive integer
- (13)
- (14)
and equality takes place only at .
Is cos always larger than sin?
Consider the range such that both and are positive; let be exact upper bound of such interval. Within this interval, sin is monotonously increasing, and cos is monotonously decreasing. Therefore, there exist one and only one solution of the equation
- (13)
Let us estimate value of this solution.
Consider the special case, substitute into equation(13) and into equation(11). This gives
In such a way,
- (14)
hence,
- (15) .
Substitute into equation (11); this gives
- (16)
- (17)
From equation (5) it follows that
- (18)
- (19)
Both sin and cos are positive in the range (0,1); and, therefore,
- (20)
Therefore,
- (21) .
Symmetry and sense of number
Change of variables and replacement to keeps the system (1)-(4) invariant. This means that
- (22)
- (23)
Consider replacement to , cos to sin, and sin to cos. Due to equation (13), such a replacement preserves the equations (1-4); therefore,
- (24)
- (25)
Then, , and
- (26)
- (27)
It follows, that functions sin and cos are periodic; and
- (30)
is period. The deduction above can be used as definition of number . In such a way, appears as half of period of functions which are solutions of equations (1,2).
For definition of , equations (1,2) are sufficient: due to the linearity of equations and the translational invariance, conditions (3,4) do not affect the period; all the solutions with different conditions at zero have the same period.
From estimate (21) it follows that
- (31)
The improvement of this estimate using the expansions (13), (14) is possible but computationally non-efficient. The efficient algorithms for evaluation of are mentioned in the spacial article about Pi. Usually, the efficient algorithms require more efforts for the deduction.
Notes
- ↑ A.P.Kiselev (1892 (first efition in Russia)). {{{title}}}. ISBN 0-9779852-0-2.
- ↑ Some authors implicitly define also functions with superscript, and . However, such a notation leads to confusions as soon as one needs to consider the inverse function (for a function , it is common to use notation for inverse function, such that ) or multiple combination of functions, for example: ; .