Netiquette: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer m (rm not) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 07:00, 25 September 2024
Netiquette is a portmanteau of "network etiquette". It was first described in IETF RFC 1855 [1]. It tries to cover the broad conventions for interacting amiably and professionally online. Different communities have different practices with regards to netiquette - what is appropriate on an anonymous image board is not appropriate on a high-level discussion group about an academic topic.
Some of the core rules of netiquette include:
- remembering that other users on the network are also human beings, and acting in such a way as you would want to be treated (as per the Golden Rule, familiar in many ethical and religious systems)
- respecting other people's time and bandwidth - which can translate into not wasting the time of your fellow users with distractions, and not e-mailing large file attachments which can waste bandwidth of users
- understanding that sarcasm and humor do not always work well in online communication, and can be misinterpreted
- not engaging in flaming, trolling, spam or malicious use of the network
- not abusing the power that has been given - for instance, not using moderator powers on mailing lists, message boards, wikis and other systems in order to silence people you disagree with, or to invade their privacy
- reading FAQs and other documentation before posting, and, on USENET and other forums, spending time lurking before posting so that one can pick up the practices of the group
- Postel's Law: "Be conservative in what you do; be liberal in what you accept from others"
- presuming ignorance rather than malice
- not 'top posting'[2][3][4]
Netiquette at Citizendium
References
- ↑ RFC 1855 - Netiquette Guidelines.
- ↑ A. Smit and H.W. de Haan, Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
- ↑ Eric Raymond, Jargon File, top-post
- ↑ Richard Kettlewell, Quoting Style