Talk:Right angle (geometry): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→first sentence: an alternate proposal) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The first sentence has the word ''angle'' in it '''five''' times! Surely this is excessive! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 12:56, 14 August 2008 (CDT) | The first sentence has the word ''angle'' in it '''five''' times! Surely this is excessive! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 12:56, 14 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
Indeed, I had put that on watch for when I felt able to concentrate on editing it. But for now I'll just crush that capital... - Not to mention ten angles in the rest! - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 14:45, 14 August 2008 (CDT) | :Indeed, I had put that on watch for when I felt able to concentrate on editing it. But for now I'll just crush that capital... - Not to mention ten angles in the rest! - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 14:45, 14 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
::Maybe we should keep it and nominate it prominently somewhere as: "The single most inglorious sentence of all of Citizendium. And maybe Wikipedia, too...." [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:19, 14 August 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:19, 14 August 2008
first sentence
The first sentence has the word angle in it five times! Surely this is excessive! Hayford Peirce 12:56, 14 August 2008 (CDT)
- Indeed, I had put that on watch for when I felt able to concentrate on editing it. But for now I'll just crush that capital... - Not to mention ten angles in the rest! - Ro Thorpe 14:45, 14 August 2008 (CDT)
- Maybe we should keep it and nominate it prominently somewhere as: "The single most inglorious sentence of all of Citizendium. And maybe Wikipedia, too...." Hayford Peirce 16:19, 14 August 2008 (CDT)