Recession of 2009/Addendum: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 71: Line 71:
!align="center"|   China  
!align="center"|   China  
!align="center"|   Russia  
!align="center"|   Russia  
|-
| January 2009
|align="center"|91.2
|align="center"|96.2
|align="center"|96.3
|align="center"|90.7
|align="center"|91.3
|align="center"|96.3
|align="center"|91.7
|align="center"|88.2
|-
| February 2009
|align="center"|90.2
|align="center"|96.3
|align="center"|96.7
|align="center"|90.3
|align="center"|90.9
|align="center"|96.3
|align="center"|92.6
|align="center"|87.0
|-
| March 2009
|align="center"|89.4
|align="center"|97.3
|align="center"|97.8
|align="center"|90.2
|align="center"|90.7
|align="center"|96.7
|align="center"|93.4
|align="center"|86.2
|-
| April 2009
|align="center"|88.7
|align="center"|98.8
|align="center"|99.0
|align="center"|91.0
|align="center"|91.2
|align="center"|97.5
|align="center"|94.6
|align="center"|86.2
|-
|-
| May 2009
| May 2009

Revision as of 09:26, 6 October 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
Tutorials [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This addendum is a continuation of the article Recession of 2009.

International recession and recovery by region

The World

The crash of 2008 had an adverse effect upon most of the world's economies, but in 2008 it was only the more vulnerable of the industrialised economies that seemed likely to suffer major downturns. By the spring of 2009, however, most of the world's economies were facing severely damage. The United States and United Kingdom economies had at first suffered more seriously than most because of collapsing housing and consumer credit booms but it soon became apparent that more serious downturns were threatening the economies of Japan and Germany. Neither had experienced such booms, but both had proved to be exceptionally vulnerable to reductions in foreign demand for their exports resulting from reductions in world trade (which is estimated to have fallen by 7 per cent in the 4th quarter of 2008) - and particularly trade in capital goods. Most of the other developed economies (except Spain and Ireland) were also relatively free of such problems, but they too were damaged by loss of exports. The economies of commodity-exporting countries in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and South America suffered mainly from falls in commodity prices, and some other emerging economies were also damaged by the withdrawal of capital inflows from the developed economies.

America

The United States

By early 2009, the United States economy was suffering from a severe lack of demand. Three and a half million jobs had been lost in just over a year and businesses were responding to falling demand by laying off workers or cutting back on their hours or wages, causing families to further reduce their demand and businesses to respond with yet more layoffs and cutbacks. The problem was being made worse by the inability of the financial system to provide the credit necessary for recovery, and the resulting "credit crunch" was causing more job losses and further declines in business activity, which, in turn, was adding more pressure on the financial system. Two and a half million families had faced foreclosure in the previous year, and the reductions in personal wealth resulting from the fall in house prices were causing further reductions in demand[1]. Reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Districts in March suggested that national economic conditions deteriorated further during the reporting period of January through late February. Ten of the twelve reports indicated weaker conditions or declines in economic activity. The deterioration was broad based, with only a few sectors such as basic food production and pharmaceuticals appearing to be exceptions. Looking ahead, contacts from various districts rate the prospects for near-term improvement in economic conditions as poor, with a significant pickup not expected before late 2009 or early 2010. The availability of credit generally remained tight. Lenders continued to impose strict standards for all types of loans, with scattered reports of further tightening and particular scrutiny focused on construction projects and commercial real estate transactions.[2]

Canada

Central and Southern America

Europe

United Kingdom

The rapid growth of the British economy in the early years of the 21st century had been partly due to the success of its comparatively large financial sector and to the development of a comparatively vigorous housing boom, and those factors had a strong influence upon the impact of the recession that followed the collapse of the Lehman Brothers bank in the United States. Even before that collapse, some of its banks had been forced to make large writedowns because of their involvement in the subprime mortgages crisis and there had been a run on one of them [3], but the banking panic that followed the fall of Lehman Brothers, threatened the continued existence of the financial system. In October 2008 the British Government announced a £500 billion rescue scheme [4], including powers to take equity stakes in ailing banks and an undertaking to guarantee interbank loans. An impending collapse of the UK's financial system was averted, but the surviving banks adopted a policy of deleveraging that resulted in a severe credit crunch followed by a general economic downturn. In the second half of 2008 gdp fell by 2.2 per cent with falls in financial sector output and in housing and commercial investment. The effective exchange rate fell by about 20 per cent during 2008, but its effect was more than offset by falling overseas demand, and there was also a fall in exports. Early fiscal and monetary action was taken to tackle the growing recession . A fiscal stimulus amounting to 1.4 per cent of GDP was introduced by the November Pre-Budget Report, including a temporary 2.5 percentage point reduction in value-added tax and a bringing forward of £3 billion of capital investment, and by March 2009 the Bank of England had reduced its the bank rate from 5% to 0.5% and begun a programme of quantitative easing. The UK’s national debt had been comparatively low at the outset of the recession[5], but there has since been a large increase in the budget deficit, which is expected to rise to over 9 per cent of gdp by the end of 2009, mainly as result of the operation of automatic stabilisers. The government's policy was endorsed by the IMF, [6] [7] but was attacked by domestic critics[8] and (at first [9]) by members of other European governments [10]. The reduction of value-added tax appears to have resulted in an early boost to retail sales [11].

Germany

The international banking panic had an immediate impact on Germany's fragmented banking system and in October 2008 the government set up a fund to guarantee the banks' debts and provide for recapitalisation and asset purchases. Although there had been falls in national output earlier in the year, the government did not at first consider further action to be necessary, but by the end of the year a fall in exports signalled the onset of major downturn, and in January of 2009 it launched a major fiscal stimulus (amounting eventually to 3.5 per cent of gdp) that included reductions in income, and payroll taxes(starting in July) as well as industrial subsidies and infrastructure investments. Those discretionary actions together with the action of the automatic stabilisers were expected to increase the budget deficit to 7% of GDP by 2010. Forecasters expect the downturn of the German economy to be deeper than those of other major industrialised countries except Japan.

France

The government adopted a fiscal stimulus amounting to over 1% of GDP, including infrastructure spending, measures to relieve cash-flow difficulties for small and medium-sized enterprises, tax holidays for low-income households, increased unemployment compensation, and loans to the car and aircraft industries. Together with the operation of automatic stabilisers, these measures are expected to raise the budget deficit to above 8% of gdp by 2010

Italy

Iceland

Before the Lehman Brothers collapse in September 2008, Iceland appeared to be in an enviable position among the developed countries. It had a thriving economy, its government had a budgetary surplus, its banks had no toxic assets and its consumers had not indulged in any speculative bubbles. (Although Willem Buiter and Anne SIbert [12], believe that its banking model was not viable). A few months later its banking system had collapsed, its government was deeply in debt, its currency had suffered a 65 per cent depreciation, real earnings had fallen by 18 per cent, and its economy was facing a deep and prolonged recession. Those were the consequences of the impact of the international credit crunch on a banking system that had overseas debts amounting to almost ten times the country's GDP. Unable to roll over their debts, three of its largest banks had to be rescued by the government, and the consequent rise in national debt caused a flight from the national currency that made matters worse. A loan was obtained from the International Monetary Fund and recovery is expected during 2011 [13].

Ireland

A downturn in the output of the formerly booming Irish construction industry that started in 2007, intensified and developed into a full-blown economic recession in the course of 2008 and construction and property companies began to default on loans from the banks. News of their defaults made foreign banks and investors, that had been the banks' principal source of short-term finance, reluctant to risk further commitments, and a banking crisis developed. In an attempt to restore confidence, the Irish government undertook to guarantee loans to the banks, as a result of which it experienced a large increase in its budgetary deficit. The sums of money involved were so large by comparison with the country's GDP that foreign investors became wary of a sovereign default, and the government's ability to finance the deficit was threatened by a general loss of confidence. In April 2009, the government decided that the only way to restore confidence was to take steps to reduce its deficit - and took the extraordinary step of increasing taxation in the midst of a recession [14]. As Paul Krugman has noted "the Irish government now predicts that this year [2009] GDP will fall more than 10 percent from its peak, crossing the line that is sometimes used to distinguish between a recession and a depression [15]

Additional steps taken include direct purchase of stock in some banks and the establishment of the 'National Asset Management Agency' - essentially a government-owned bank that will buy toxic debt from six financial institutions - both steps aimed at improving their balance sheets and freeing up capital.[16][17]

Russia

Asia

Japan

Japan has suffered a much deeper recession than the other large industrialised economies mainly because of its greater reliance upon exports of cars and high-technology products. Output was also restricted by a credit crunch and by the need to reduce high inventory levels [18].

China

Developing countries

According to a World Bank report published in March 2009, 94 out of 116 developing countries have experienced a slowdown in economic growth. Of these countries, 43 have high levels of poverty. To date, the most affected sectors are those that were the most dynamic, typically urban-based exporters, construction, mining, and manufacturing[19].


Leading Indicators

Ratio to trend, amplitude adjusted, per cent
(long-term average = 100)
Growth cycle phases of the CLI are defined as follows: expansion (increase above 100), downturn (decrease above 100), slowdown (decrease below100), recovery (increase below 100).

   Japan       Italy       France      Germany    United States United Kingdom   China     Russia  
May 2009 89.5 101.1 100.3 93.8 92.7 98.3 96.3 88.2
June 2009 93.5 102 101.3 96.3 94.4 99.3 98 91.5
July 2009 94.0 104.8 102.7 98.5 96 100.6 99.4 92.8


Source: OECD Composite leading indicators [4]

Forecasts

Annual percentage growth in Gross Domestic Product
(forecasts are shown in italics)
Date Source Country 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
30 March 2009 World Bank [5] United States 2.0 1.1 -2.4 2.0
Japan 2.1 -0.7 -5.3 1.3
Euro area 2.6 0.7 -2.7 0.9
China 12 9.0 6.5 7.3
Developing [20] 6.1 5.8 2.2 4.8
World 3.7 3.1 -0.6 2.9
9 May 2009 Economist Poll [6] United States -2.9 1.4
United Kingdom -3.7 0.3
France -2.9 0.3
Germany -5.2 0.3
Japan -6.4 0.6
1 June 2009 OECD Economic Outlook [7] United States 1.1 -2.8 0.9
United Kingdom 0.7 -4.3 0.0
France 0.7 -3.0 -0.2
Germany 1.0 -6.1 0.2
Japan -0.6 -6.8 0.7
3 October 2009 International Monetary Fund [8] United States 2.0 0.8 -2.7 1.5
United Kingdom 3.0 0.7 -4.4 0.9
France 2.1 0.3 -2.4 0.9
Germany 2.5 1.3 -5.3 -0.3
Japan 2.4 -0.7 -5.4 1.7'
China 13 9 8.5 9.0
World 3.8 3.1 -1.1 3.1


  1. Based on Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's statement to the Senate Finance Committee March 4 2009
  2. Federal Reserve "Beige Book", March 2009
  3. Rush on Northern Rock Continues, BBC News 17 September 2007
  4. Rescue Plan for UK Banks Unveiled, BBC News 8 October 2008
  5. See paragraph 3.4 of the tutorials subpage
  6. Statement by the Deputy Managing Director of the IMF that ...we are confident that the measures being taken... will strengthen the economy... [1]
  7. United Kingdom – 2009 Article IV Consultation, Concluding Statement of the Mission, International Monetary Fund, May 20, 2009 [2]
  8. George Osborne, as reported in the Daily Telegraph 14 December 2008
  9. The German government subsequently introduced a larger fiscal stimulus - see paragraph 3.3 of the tutorials subpage
  10. Germany Questions UK Rescue Plan, BBC News 11th December 2008
  11. Credit Where Credit’s Due – the VAT Cut is Working, "Forecasting Eye", Centre for Economic and Business Research, 18 April 2009
  12. Willem Buiter and Anne SIbert: The Icelandic Banking Crisis and What To Do About It, Policy Insight No 26, Centre for Economic Policy Research, October 2008[3]
  13. Country Report No. 08/362, International Monetary Fund, November 2008
  14. Budget Statement, Department of Finance, April 7, 2009
  15. Paul Krugman: Erin Go Broke, New York Times, April 18 2009
  16. Department of Finance, Ireland. Minister for Finance, Mr Brian Lenihan, TD, announces appointment of interim Managing Director of the National Asset Management Agency (html). Retrieved on 2009-05-12.
  17. Money Guide Ireland. NAMA - National Asset Management Agency. Retrieved on 2009-05-12.
  18. Martin Sommer: Why Has Japan Been Hit So Hard by the Global Recession?, Staff Note SPN/09/05, International Monetary Fund, March 18, 2009
  19. Crisis Reveals Growing Finance Gaps for Developing Countries, World Bank, 8th March 2009
  20. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named dev