Talk:Active attack/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
Line 7: Line 7:


== Call for review re approval ==
== Call for review re approval ==
== Approval Process: {{ApprovalProcess|call}} ==
''Call for review: ''[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 20:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
''Call for Approval: ''
''Approval Notice: ''
''Certification of Approval: ''
----
''Please discuss the article below, [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Approval]] is for brief official referee's only!''
=== Comments ===

Revision as of 14:21, 22 April 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 

Perhaps more of an aside from electronic warfare...

Rather than active vs. passive in electronic attack, the terminology nonkinetic vs. kinetic is used. Nonkinetic uses all the elegant electronic and computer methods, while kinetic is truly brute force. Many years ago, I was at an Armed Forces Communications Electronics Association meeting after the 1973 Middle East war. Someone asked an Israeli general how he preferred to counter a particular Soviet radar, expecting some involved imitative jamming technique. He said he really preferred a 500 pound bomb straight down the antenna. Howard C. Berkowitz 06:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


Call for review re approval