Meromorphic functions: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
mNo edit summary
imported>Meg Taylor
m (spelling: wiht -> with)
Line 7: Line 7:


For example, [[factorial]] is meromorphic in the whole comples plane (it has [[countable set]] of poles at the negative integer values of the arguemnt), but [[logarithm]] is not, because it has cutline at the negative part of the real axis. However, the eame logarithm becomes  
For example, [[factorial]] is meromorphic in the whole comples plane (it has [[countable set]] of poles at the negative integer values of the arguemnt), but [[logarithm]] is not, because it has cutline at the negative part of the real axis. However, the eame logarithm becomes  
meromorphic being considered on the domain of numbers wiht positive real part.
meromorphic being considered on the domain of numbers with positive real part.

Revision as of 00:31, 15 February 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In complex analysis, a meromorphic function on an open subset D of the complex plane is a function that is holomorphic on all D except a set of isolated points, which are poles for the function. (The terminology comes from the Ancient Greek “meros” (μέρος), meaning part, as opposed to “holos” (ὅλος), meaning whole.)

In particular, every holomorphic function can be considered as meromorphic.

Many of special functions are meromorphic.

For example, factorial is meromorphic in the whole comples plane (it has countable set of poles at the negative integer values of the arguemnt), but logarithm is not, because it has cutline at the negative part of the real axis. However, the eame logarithm becomes meromorphic being considered on the domain of numbers with positive real part.