Extrajudicial detention, U.S.: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
|}
|}
==Later cases==
==Later cases==
===Medical===
There are a number of laws that provide for the indefinite detention, or other restrictions outside prison, on persons judged to be sexual predators. [[Kansas v. Crane]], the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] made it necessary that the prosecution prove uncontrollable impulses.
===Security-related===
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!Date
!Date

Revision as of 15:38, 9 March 2009

See also: User: Howard C. Berkowitz/EJUSGWB

Extrajudicial detention by the United States has taken place under a number of Administrations, sometimes during overt war, and, perhaps better known at present, directed against non-national threats. There has also been extraordinary rendition to third countries. Certain of these detentions have been considered generally consistent with customary international and U.S. law of the time, while others were much more controversial. Detention and rendition programs have been most extensive under the George W. Bush Administration; some have been repudiated by the successor Obama Administration.

Some actions, such as the execution, as a spy, of a British Army major, John Andre, during the American Revolution were consistent with international treatment of spies. Military law, which, until recently, was the main basis of extrajudicial actions, was first promulgated as the Lieber Code during the American Civil War.

American Civil War

Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and detained many he considered threats to the Union.

Ex parte Milligan was a detention case considered by the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court held that a citizen, in an area where the civilian courts were operating, could not be tried by a military commission.

Second World War

International law historically has given protection to lawful combatants in direct conflict, allowing them prisoner of war status. Far fewer protections have been granted to enemy agents, both in combatant and in intelligence-gathering roles, who operated in civilian or other disguise. Many of these precedents were argued in detention cases of the George W. Bush Administration.

Date Citizenship Place of capture Captured by Detainment and place Person(s) and cases Comments
1942 U.S. citizens and aliens of Japanese ancestry U.S. U.S. civil and military U.S. in U.S. Executive Order 9066; 56 Stat. 173, March 21, 1942; Korematsu v. United States (1944) SCOTUS upheld detention in Korematsu case
1942 German (military), in civilian clothes and with sabotage materials U.S. U.S. military U.S. military in U.S. ex parte Quirin‎ SCOTUS approved military jurisdiction
1950 German (military) China U.S. military U.S. military in China and Germany Johnson v. Eisentrager‎ SCOTUS denied habeas

Later cases

Medical

There are a number of laws that provide for the indefinite detention, or other restrictions outside prison, on persons judged to be sexual predators. Kansas v. Crane, the Supreme Court of the United States made it necessary that the prosecution prove uncontrollable impulses.

Security-related

Date Citizenship Place of capture Captured by Detainment and place Person(s) and cases Comments
1995 Danish resident Croatia CIA Egypt Tal`at Fu'ad Qassim Clinton Administration Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 39[1]