Randomized controlled trial/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (add biblio item) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (annotate biblio item) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7499/1049 Comparison of allocation concealment] | * [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7499/1049 Comparison of allocation concealment] | ||
* Rosmalen JGM, Oldehinkel AJ. (2011) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001143 The Role of Group Dynamics in Scientific Inconsistencies: A Case Study of a Research Consortium]. ''PLoS Med'' 8(12): e1001143. | * Rosmalen JGM, Oldehinkel AJ. (2011) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001143 The Role of Group Dynamics in Scientific Inconsistencies: A Case Study of a Research Consortium]. ''PLoS Med'' 8(12): e1001143. | ||
** <font face="Gill Sans MT">Summary Points: | |||
*** Findings reported in published articles often provide an unrealistic picture of the data that are actually generated in scientific research. | |||
*** This is partly due to ineffective group dynamics within research groups and collaborations. | |||
*** These practices may be improved by having clearly defined overall goals, explicitly described roles and responsibilities for all coauthors, and a rational choice of methodological strategies.</font> | |||
Latest revision as of 09:18, 14 December 2011
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
- Allocation concealment and blinding
- Comparison of allocation concealment
- Rosmalen JGM, Oldehinkel AJ. (2011) The Role of Group Dynamics in Scientific Inconsistencies: A Case Study of a Research Consortium. PLoS Med 8(12): e1001143.
- Summary Points:
- Findings reported in published articles often provide an unrealistic picture of the data that are actually generated in scientific research.
- This is partly due to ineffective group dynamics within research groups and collaborations.
- These practices may be improved by having clearly defined overall goals, explicitly described roles and responsibilities for all coauthors, and a rational choice of methodological strategies.
- Summary Points: