Talk:Bad bank: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:28, 11 December 2009

Should such an institution be spanked? Howard C. Berkowitz 14:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

It could cause major problems for the financial markets. Chris Day 14:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

In general, that might indeed be the case. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

To be prudent, possibly it should be a private matter? Chris Day 04:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:17, 11 December 2009 (view source) imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:28, 11 December 2009 (view source) imported>Chris Day (→‎Corporal for the capital?) Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::In ''general'', that might indeed be the case. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz\|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)		::In ''general'', that might indeed be the case. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz\|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

			::To be prudent, possibly it should be a private matter? [[User:Chris Day\|Chris Day]] 04:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)