User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Notes: Difference between revisions
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | COASP 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Wikis as platforms for scholarly publishing== | ==Wikis as platforms for scholarly publishing== | ||
*The idea is not new — [http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/WikiSciencePublication WikiSciencePublication] stated in 2006: | |||
:"Somewhere at the fringe of science, someone will start using wiki publishing for science publishing." | |||
*Conferences: [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2010 Stand-alone site] / [[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010|contextualized schedule]] / [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|contextualized talks]] and [[:Image:Neuroimaging workflow.png|Posters]] (possibly also as clickable imagemaps, like [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|here]]) | *Conferences: [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2010 Stand-alone site] / [[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010|contextualized schedule]] / [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|contextualized talks]] and [[:Image:Neuroimaging workflow.png|Posters]] (possibly also as clickable imagemaps, like [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|here]]) | ||
| Line 29: | Line 32: | ||
*[http://www.wittylama.com/2009/09/wikipedia-journal/ Wikipedia Journal] | *[http://www.wittylama.com/2009/09/wikipedia-journal/ Wikipedia Journal] | ||
*[http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/is-a-knol-a-scientific-publishing-platform/#comment-1492 Knol] shares some aspects with wikis and blogs and is already in use for [http://www.ploscurrents.org/ PLoS Currents]. | *[http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/is-a-knol-a-scientific-publishing-platform/#comment-1492 Knol] shares some aspects with wikis and blogs and is already in use for [http://www.ploscurrents.org/ PLoS Currents]. | ||
Revision as of 01:56, 1 June 2010
Background
- For technical reasons, publishing was historically a separate step, performed about once per iteration of the research cycle
- Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, and the remaining hurdles are cultural ones.
Wikis as platforms for science communication
- Wikis can be used, in principle, for any aspect of scholarly communication, as detailed in this comparison of wiki- and paper-based communication systems and the related blog post.
- Examples exist for all steps of the research cycle, except successful applications to major funders (see this overview for some attempts)
Wikis as platforms for scholarly publishing
- The idea is not new — WikiSciencePublication stated in 2006:
- "Somewhere at the fringe of science, someone will start using wiki publishing for science publishing."
- Conferences: Stand-alone site / contextualized schedule / contextualized talks and Posters (possibly also as clickable imagemaps, like here)
- Research papers: Accompanied by wiki article, contextualized on-wiki, links to wikis amongst other sources
- Publication lists (incl. supplementary materials and in principle direct links to the raw data)
- built-in article-level metrics at bottom of page and via What links here (which could also be used for other pages, e.g. those hosting images, references, or datasets), author-level metrics via Special:Contributions, further aggregation possible (e.g. at the level of research projects, labs or thematic workgroups)
- Knol shares some aspects with wikis and blogs and is already in use for PLoS Currents.
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing
- The majority of wiki platforms are open access by default, and most variants of wiki software can handle user rights in great detail
- Stresses the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for images) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. detailed discussion with respect to the American Physical Society, arxiv and Quantiki, and the final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works).
Business models
- Main ones: author-pays, (partial) subscription, philanthropy, advertising, premium services
- Not really tried yet: article-specific Job ads (e.g. via subpages)