Template:CharterVote2/3/Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(probably not necessary.)
 
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Nobody seems to think this is necessary.  I would be willing to change my vote to reject and get rid of it unless some rewording was presented. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Nobody seems to think this is necessary.  I would be willing to change my vote to reject and get rid of it unless some rewording was presented. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
:See my comment on Article 2.  This article should make a statement protecting Citizens' rights, but it doesn't.  Not really.  I suggest this, a slight modification of Jones' statement regarding Article 2:
:*No citizen's use of the site shall be blocked or terminated on the basis of nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, or age.
:**Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances when required under local law.
:How's that? -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:34, 16 July 2010

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

Nobody seems to think this is necessary. I would be willing to change my vote to reject and get rid of it unless some rewording was presented. D. Matt Innis 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

See my comment on Article 2. This article should make a statement protecting Citizens' rights, but it doesn't. Not really. I suggest this, a slight modification of Jones' statement regarding Article 2:
  • No citizen's use of the site shall be blocked or terminated on the basis of nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, or age.
    • Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances when required under local law.
How's that? -Joe Quick 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)