Talk:Betty Crocker: Difference between revisions
imported>Mary Ash (Discussing fair use of image added) |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Added a Screenshot I Took Showing the Official Portraits of Betty Crocker: About the screen shot) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Added a Screenshot I Took Showing the Official Portraits of Betty Crocker == | == Added a Screenshot I Took Showing the Official Portraits of Betty Crocker == | ||
I do believe it's considered fair use as I took a screenshot of Betty Crocker and uploaded it with the copyright to General Mills. Using the screenshot I took probably is copyrighted by me since I created the image, but I am not a copyright lawyer. If anyone wants to edit the copyright status or comment please do so. I do believe this is fair use as Citizendium is a nonprofit encyclopedia. What do you all think? | |||
[[User:Mary Ash|Mary Ash]] 14:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Mary Ash | [[User:Mary Ash|Mary Ash]] 14:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Mary Ash | ||
:As the originator of this comment you do '''not''' need to indent with any colons at all. As the first replier to this comment, I indented with one colon. If someone else replies or remarks on this comment after me, he/she will use two colons (even if it is you, saying thanks). | |||
:I agree that your screenshot is probably okay as fair use. But you, as the one who took the screenshot, are definitely '''not''' the copyright holder. Regards, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 15:23, 26 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:23, 26 July 2010
Removed a section
Removed the section about the 1950 Betty Crocker Picture Cook Book as there was no photo of ++ Betty in that edition. I checked my old cookbooks and it's the 1956 edition that Betty's face is seen smiling. I will try to add that information later. Mary Ash 04:50, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
The two references need to be worked over
Mary, I have not made any revisions or relocation, but you should be aware:
- The hyperlink for the second "reference", http://adage.com/century/icon04.html/topic , does not work. All I get is a "Not found" error.
- A book citation, a journal citation or a hyperlink to an online website is not a "reference" (or a "note") unless it is tied to a specific word or sentence in the article by a number such as [1]. If it doesn't to that, then it is either a "Bibliography" item or an "External Links" item and should be moved to those subpages.
After you correct the hyperlink that does not work, if you want the two references to be tied to some specific words or specific sentences in the article so that they are truly "references", then please respond here and tell me where you want them to be tied to, and I will do that for you and do it in the correct reference format. If you do not want to tie them to specific words or sentences, then let me know that and I will transfer them to the "External Links" subpage for you.
I will await your reply. When you reply, all you need (as the first one to reply) is one colon (:) to indent your reply correctly and you do not need to add your name after the four tildes because the tildes automatically sign and date your posting. If someone else replies before you do and uses one colon, then as the second replier you use two colons (::). Milton Beychok 05:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikilinking
So you'll know what I did, I put the relevant existing article title, First Lady of the United States, into your link to First Lady, so it reads, in edit mode, [[First Lady of the United States|First Lady]]. That turns your redlink (i.e., target needs to be defined) to blue, linking to the live article.
We tend not to link common words, in phrases, such as school. The rule of thumb: ask yourself if the reader would be likely to click on the link in order to understand the usage. I did link a phrase or two.
If CZ has an Official Food Photographer, it's Hayford. Howard C. Berkowitz 05:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Related articles
In the article, you make the important point that Betty was both an advertising triumph, but also a contributor to a cooking style. Might I suggest you put, under Subtopics, some of the dishes that you most associate with her? We can certainly have articles and recipes for them as new articles.
Of course, there's a whole area of advertising icons of which she was an early exemplar. Perhaps someone might do the AFLAC duck, Geico gecko, Geico cavemen, etc.
There is a recipe template, which Hayford can explain better than I — I tend to write more in the sense of general approaches to technique, such as red-stewing. Howard C. Berkowitz 08:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Added a Screenshot I Took Showing the Official Portraits of Betty Crocker
I do believe it's considered fair use as I took a screenshot of Betty Crocker and uploaded it with the copyright to General Mills. Using the screenshot I took probably is copyrighted by me since I created the image, but I am not a copyright lawyer. If anyone wants to edit the copyright status or comment please do so. I do believe this is fair use as Citizendium is a nonprofit encyclopedia. What do you all think?
Mary Ash 14:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Mary Ash
- As the originator of this comment you do not need to indent with any colons at all. As the first replier to this comment, I indented with one colon. If someone else replies or remarks on this comment after me, he/she will use two colons (even if it is you, saying thanks).
- I agree that your screenshot is probably okay as fair use. But you, as the one who took the screenshot, are definitely not the copyright holder. Regards, Milton Beychok 15:23, 26 July 2010 (UTC)