Talk:Stress and appetite: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas C Horne No edit summary |
imported>Emelie Gustafson No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I think the course organiser agreed that more than one group could carry out the same talk, is there any way we could split the talk? or maybe he wouldn't mind if two groups covered the same talk. | I think the course organiser agreed that more than one group could carry out the same talk, is there any way we could split the talk? or maybe he wouldn't mind if two groups covered the same talk. | ||
The problem is that then the same topics will be covered. But if the course organise is okay with it, then I suppose it would be okay. But I doubt that there will be 7 different topics under this subject which will be big enough to write enough on. So they would end up pretty similar. | |||
Revision as of 07:33, 28 September 2010
- Christina Lang 13:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Cyrus Dailami 12:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- James Pattinson 13:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Emelie Gustafson 13:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Holly Clark 13:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Gillian McNeill 13:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thomas C Horne 13:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Testing! We are far too many on this topic. Max. 4. During the class last week it was decided that Holly, Gillian, Christina and I (Emelie) were doing this topic since we signed up to it. Just wondering what's going on, and how we are going to adress this.
I think the course organiser agreed that more than one group could carry out the same talk, is there any way we could split the talk? or maybe he wouldn't mind if two groups covered the same talk.
The problem is that then the same topics will be covered. But if the course organise is okay with it, then I suppose it would be okay. But I doubt that there will be 7 different topics under this subject which will be big enough to write enough on. So they would end up pretty similar.