Spoken language: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson (new section to remove all WP content) |
imported>John Stephenson (terms) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Spoken language contrasts with both [[sign language]] and [[written language]]. While a sign language is a language in its own right, written language is a way of recording a (usually also spoken) language. Signed and spoken language are therefore two instances of language itself, rather than one being prioritised over the other in any way. Sign languages have the same natural origin as spoken languages, and the same grammatical complexities, but use the hands, arms, and face rather than parts of the mouth. | Spoken language contrasts with both [[sign language]] and [[written language]]. While a sign language is a language in its own right, written language is a way of recording a (usually also spoken) language. Signed and spoken language are therefore two instances of language itself, rather than one being prioritised over the other in any way. Sign languages have the same natural origin as spoken languages, and the same grammatical complexities, but use the hands, arms, and face rather than parts of the mouth. | ||
When examining language that may be spoken or written, [[linguistics|linguists]] generally consider that more fundamental insights can be gleaned into the nature of language by analysing natural, spontaneous speech, whereas the written word is considered at best an incomplete representation of a linguistic system. One reason for this is the fact that written language usually develops as a way to record spoken language rather than as a separate system. This also means that in many cultures, community languages are unwritten (such as [[Pirahã language|Pirahã]] in [[Brazil]]). Another point is that children [[language acquisition|acquire]] their first language(s) through speech or signing, and never solely through writing; a focus on written language therefore ignores linguistic development prior to [[literacy]]. Another reason is that [[writing system]]s typically ignore many features of spoken language - for example, the [[English language|English]] [[alphabet]] does not show [[stress (linguistics)|stress]] (''rebel'', out of [[context]], could be the [[verb]] or the [[noun]]), and the [[Japanese language|Japanese]] | When examining language that may be spoken or written, [[linguistics|linguists]] generally consider that more fundamental insights can be gleaned into the nature of language by analysing natural, spontaneous speech, whereas the written word is considered at best an incomplete representation of a linguistic system. One reason for this is the fact that written language usually develops as a way to record spoken language rather than as a separate system. This also means that in many cultures, community languages are unwritten (such as [[Pirahã language|Pirahã]] in [[Brazil]]). Another point is that children [[language acquisition|acquire]] their first language(s) through speech or signing, and never solely through writing; a focus on written language therefore ignores linguistic development prior to [[literacy]]. Another reason is that [[writing system]]s typically ignore many features of spoken language - for example, the [[English language|English]] [[alphabet]] does not show [[stress (linguistics)|stress]] (''rebel'', out of [[context]], could be the [[verb]] or the [[noun]]), and the [[Japanese language|Japanese]] [[syllabary]] does not record [[pitch accent languages|pitch accent]].<ref>For example, ''hashi'', written はし for ''ha'' and ''shi'' in ''[[hiragana]]'', can mean 'chopsticks' or 'bridge'. The [[pitch]] contour of the [[voice]] over the two [[syllable]]s leads to different [[pronunciation]] in many varieties of Japanese, including the standard form. In writing, the only way to show the difference outside of context is to use ''[[kanji]]'' (Chinese-derived [[Chinese characters|characters]]) - 橋 is 'bridge' and 箸 is 'chopsticks'. With another word following, a ''third'' meaning is possible: 'edge' (端).</ref> | ||
Although [[computer]]s can produce artificial speech with the appropriate equipment and [[software]], this tends to fall outside the definitions of 'spoken language'. | Although [[computer]]s can produce artificial speech with the appropriate equipment and [[software]], this tends to fall outside the definitions of 'spoken language'. | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 27 May 2008
Spoken language has two meanings. In one sense, it is any example of language produced using some of the articulatory organs, e.g. the mouth, vocal folds or lungs. In another way, it may refer to the entire act of communicating verbally - what people mean or intend, the words they use, their accent, intonation and so on; anything, in fact, that might be found in speech rather than other forms of expression.
Spoken language contrasts with both sign language and written language. While a sign language is a language in its own right, written language is a way of recording a (usually also spoken) language. Signed and spoken language are therefore two instances of language itself, rather than one being prioritised over the other in any way. Sign languages have the same natural origin as spoken languages, and the same grammatical complexities, but use the hands, arms, and face rather than parts of the mouth.
When examining language that may be spoken or written, linguists generally consider that more fundamental insights can be gleaned into the nature of language by analysing natural, spontaneous speech, whereas the written word is considered at best an incomplete representation of a linguistic system. One reason for this is the fact that written language usually develops as a way to record spoken language rather than as a separate system. This also means that in many cultures, community languages are unwritten (such as Pirahã in Brazil). Another point is that children acquire their first language(s) through speech or signing, and never solely through writing; a focus on written language therefore ignores linguistic development prior to literacy. Another reason is that writing systems typically ignore many features of spoken language - for example, the English alphabet does not show stress (rebel, out of context, could be the verb or the noun), and the Japanese syllabary does not record pitch accent.[1]
Although computers can produce artificial speech with the appropriate equipment and software, this tends to fall outside the definitions of 'spoken language'.
Footnotes
- ↑ For example, hashi, written はし for ha and shi in hiragana, can mean 'chopsticks' or 'bridge'. The pitch contour of the voice over the two syllables leads to different pronunciation in many varieties of Japanese, including the standard form. In writing, the only way to show the difference outside of context is to use kanji (Chinese-derived characters) - 橋 is 'bridge' and 箸 is 'chopsticks'. With another word following, a third meaning is possible: 'edge' (端).