Talk:Logic symbols: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
(→‎Origin: no imports, please!)
imported>John R. Brews
(→‎Origin: To Peter)
Line 9: Line 9:
: Moreover, on CZ such lists are not put on mainspace pages but on Catalague subpages of an appropriate main page.
: Moreover, on CZ such lists are not put on mainspace pages but on Catalague subpages of an appropriate main page.
: --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
: --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
::Being unversed in these matters, feel free to put things in order. I felt that as the table has no interpretive content and is simply a convenience to the reader, it would not be much different whoever put it together. On that basis it seemed to me to escape the CZ cautions about WP imports. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 03:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:07, 2 July 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A shorthand for logical constructions [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Origin

A slightly modified version of List of logic symbols from Wikipedia. John R. Brews 21:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

John, by EC regulation such imports are not welcome on CZ. Of course, the WP list can be taken as a useful aid when compiling such a list.
By the way, as far as I see the list lacks some common symbols, and, in my view, neither the structure (grouping) nor the layout is optimal. This leaves many possibilities to develop an independent list.
Moreover, on CZ such lists are not put on mainspace pages but on Catalague subpages of an appropriate main page.
--Peter Schmitt 23:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Being unversed in these matters, feel free to put things in order. I felt that as the table has no interpretive content and is simply a convenience to the reader, it would not be much different whoever put it together. On that basis it seemed to me to escape the CZ cautions about WP imports. John R. Brews 03:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)