Just war theory: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(PropDel)
mNo edit summary
 
Line 17: Line 17:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 07:00, 7 September 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Just war theory was first proposed by Augustine of Hippo, and forms the base for the Laws of Land Warfare, Hague Conventions and the Geneva Conventions, war crimes courts such as the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg) and the International Criminal Court, and the ethics involved in complex situations such as nuclear deterrence, terrorism, and counterterrorism.

It has three fundamental components:

Despite the Latin, the former two terms were articulated in the 20th century. [1]

That the formal language may be recent does not mean that the ideas are new, or that they are limited to Western societies. Kamehameha I is known for introducing the Law of the Broken Paddle, which reflects the proportionality concept of jus in bello.

References

  1. Robert Kolb (31 October 1997), "Origin of the twin terms jus ad bellum/jus in bello", International Review of the Red Cross