Talk:Science: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Science
|                cat1 =
|                cat2 = Philosophy
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = N
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = N
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 18:47, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
 


==Mofdifications==
==Mofdifications==

Revision as of 14:09, 14 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The organized body of knowledge based on non–trivial refutable concepts that can be verified or rejected on the base of observation and experimentation [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Philosophy, Physics and Chemistry [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Mofdifications

I put here the reasons for some changes.

  • I deleted all the paragraphs, which are refering to supernatural. The text stated that science is not able to examine supernatural phenomena. But this statement presupposes that there are such phenomena.
  • I also deleted all reference that science can not examine "what is". Science is of course not a kind of fundamentalist realism. But actually the realism debate is not a scientific issue. We must formulate science in a way, which is devoid of such ideologic debates.
  • I also modified the parts, which describe the negative effects of science. I made it clearer that science is only a tool. The tool can be used ina good or bad way. This is not a scientific issue.

--Matthias Brendel 06:13, 30 November 2006 (CST)

RE

  • I also modified the parts, which describe the negative effects of science. I made it clearer that science is only a tool. The tool can be used ina good or bad way. This is not a scientific issue.

Perhaps a link to articles in Economics and Politics where such discussions are relevant may be useful for a variety of reasons David Tribe 16:11, 7 February 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Science&oldid=107917"