Talk:Linux (operating system): Difference between revisions
imported>Raymond Pasco (linux vs linux distribution) |
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Added the checklist) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Linux | |||
| cat1 = Computers | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = y | |||
| status = 3 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = n | |||
| by = --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 11:28, 31 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
Is anyone else amused about how cautious the first paragraph is? It's like two points of view are both trying to express their arguments in one sentence. I'd almost say we should just have a minor heading about Linux vs GNU/Linux. --[[User:Nick Johnson|Nick Johnson]] 11:06, 22 February 2007 (CST) | Is anyone else amused about how cautious the first paragraph is? It's like two points of view are both trying to express their arguments in one sentence. I'd almost say we should just have a minor heading about Linux vs GNU/Linux. --[[User:Nick Johnson|Nick Johnson]] 11:06, 22 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 10:50, 31 March 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | --Eric M Gearhart 11:28, 31 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Is anyone else amused about how cautious the first paragraph is? It's like two points of view are both trying to express their arguments in one sentence. I'd almost say we should just have a minor heading about Linux vs GNU/Linux. --Nick Johnson 11:06, 22 February 2007 (CST)
I wonder if that is not obtained when starting with MIMIX as the start for Linus Torvald's endeavour to create a multipurpose unix version. Put that into historic context to the free software becoming more popular, resulting in (now) consultancy companies prividing free open source linux such as Red Hat and the likes. Robert Tito | Talk 11:12, 22 February 2007 (CST)
I think "Linux" should be about Linux (the thing on kernel.org) and "Linux distribution" should discuss the operating system family &c. I really don't mean to say this in the context of any GNU/Linux name debate (note that I didn't suggest an article named "GNU/Linux distribution"), but the coincidental placement of this comment might make it seem that way. Rather, I think that this is more precise terminology, and that both articles would be able to contain very different sets of information, as a kernel and a family of operating systems are rather different things, even if this family of operating systems is defined by being based around said kernel. --Raymond Pasco 20:59, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup