Talk:Linux (operating system): Difference between revisions
imported>Eric M Gearhart |
imported>Joshua David Williams |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Shouldn't [[microkernel]] and [[monolithic kernel]] both redirect to [[Monolithic versus Microkernel]]? --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 13:36, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | Shouldn't [[microkernel]] and [[monolithic kernel]] both redirect to [[Monolithic versus Microkernel]]? --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 13:36, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
I'll take this silence as a "yes". If not, feel free to change the redirection pages. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 19:26, 11 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 18:26, 11 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Eric M Gearhart 18:00, 11 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Linux talk archives |
Archive 1, 4-9-07: Talk:Linux/Archive1 |
Archive 2, 4-11-07: Talk:Linux/Archive2 |
Call for Approval
Per CZ:Approval_Process, as an author who has contributed significantly to this article (among others) I am requesting this article be submitted to the Approval process by an editor. --Eric M Gearhart 18:00, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
reorg of old sections, new sections needed
Here's some suggestions for where else to take this article. I reorged the old ones into two simpler sections, Origins and Applications. What I think would help, now, would be a section on Linux' successes and failures in the marketplace...I have now moved the long summary that used to be here into the article itself.Pat Palmer 22:16, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
Which is correct?
Is it Linux' or Linux's? Do any of you know which is technically correct?
- As far as I know it would be Linux's, because although the name ends in an 'S' sound it's not actually an 'S'.
Compare with Alex' versus Alex's --Eric M Gearhart 15:03, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
GNU/Linux
Do you guys think the GNU/Linux controversy is notable enough to have its own article? --Joshua David Williams 22:36, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
- I wouldn't break that out at this time (unless this article becomes too big). I think it's pretty well covered out on the larger world wide web. However, if it really turns you on, perhaps you should go for it.Pat Palmer 23:00, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
- The history of the open source community is really my niche. I might have a go at it after I've finished the Tux article. Right now I'm having a bit of a hard time finding the correct chronological order for that one. --Joshua David Williams 23:02, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
Kernel type
Shouldn't microkernel and monolithic kernel both redirect to Monolithic versus Microkernel? --Joshua David Williams 13:36, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
I'll take this silence as a "yes". If not, feel free to change the redirection pages. --Joshua David Williams 19:26, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup