Talk:Ontological argument for the existence of God: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Folkinshteyn (style question/suggestion) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am all for good fun, but i think it's a case of rather gratuitous pretentiousness to use the ae ligature in medieval (or anything else, really :) ). It's just not a valid letter of the english alphabet, and there is no reason to complicate things with it. comments? | I am all for good fun, but i think it's a case of rather gratuitous pretentiousness to use the ae ligature in medieval (or anything else, really :) ). It's just not a valid letter of the english alphabet, and there is no reason to complicate things with it. comments? | ||
== That lower-case g == | |||
This article should be fun. | |||
But I have to say...I have never encountered a discussion of the traditional arguments for the existence of God that did not upper-case 'God'. Is this a case where we can agree to use the upper case, purely on grounds of common usage? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:07, 15 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:07, 15 March 2007
down with ae ligature?
I am all for good fun, but i think it's a case of rather gratuitous pretentiousness to use the ae ligature in medieval (or anything else, really :) ). It's just not a valid letter of the english alphabet, and there is no reason to complicate things with it. comments?
That lower-case g
This article should be fun.
But I have to say...I have never encountered a discussion of the traditional arguments for the existence of God that did not upper-case 'God'. Is this a case where we can agree to use the upper case, purely on grounds of common usage? --Larry Sanger 18:07, 15 March 2007 (CDT)