Talk:William Jennings Bryan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos m (wording) |
imported>Richard Jensen No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = y | | cat_check = y | ||
| status = | | status = 1 | ||
| underlinked = y | | underlinked = y | ||
| cleanup = y | | cleanup = y | ||
| by = [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]] ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 21:27, 20 March 2007 (CDT) | | by = [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]] ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 21:27, 20 March 2007 (CDT); upgrade status per new changes [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:06, 27 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
==CZ Live?== | ==CZ Live?== | ||
I have a problem with qualifying this article(CZ Live or external). On one hand it looks like a perfectly external article (very similar to WP), on the other hand some improvements have been done. When the history is examined, most of that looks like cleanup and minor rewording. So I'm inclined to confirm the status=4 and delete CZ live tag. If, however, the author(s) of the article think(s) that it is significantly different from the WP version, please feel free to revert my edit and consistently change the article status in the checklist. --[[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 09:23, 27 June 2007 (CDT) | I have a problem with qualifying this article(CZ Live or external). On one hand it looks like a perfectly external article (very similar to WP), on the other hand some improvements have been done. When the history is examined, most of that looks like cleanup and minor rewording. So I'm inclined to confirm the status=4 and delete CZ live tag. If, however, the author(s) of the article think(s) that it is significantly different from the WP version, please feel free to revert my edit and consistently change the article status in the checklist. --[[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 09:23, 27 June 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 19:06, 27 June 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Law Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Joe Quick (Talk) 21:27, 20 March 2007 (CDT); upgrade status per new changes Richard Jensen 20:06, 27 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
CZ Live?
I have a problem with qualifying this article(CZ Live or external). On one hand it looks like a perfectly external article (very similar to WP), on the other hand some improvements have been done. When the history is examined, most of that looks like cleanup and minor rewording. So I'm inclined to confirm the status=4 and delete CZ live tag. If, however, the author(s) of the article think(s) that it is significantly different from the WP version, please feel free to revert my edit and consistently change the article status in the checklist. --Aleksander Stos 09:23, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Law Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Law Advanced Articles
- Law Nonstub Articles
- Law Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Law Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Law Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Law Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Law External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Law Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Law Cleanup
- Cleanup