Talk:West Nile virus: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk (→Internationalization: need a reference first! etc.) |
imported>David E. Volk (forgot to sign last message) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Internationalization == | == Internationalization == | ||
We really ought to report global data, at least about the virus in other English-speaking countries than the U.S., although I am sure the interests of English-speaking readers extend to the whole world, when it comes to this virus. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:33, 9 October 2007 (CDT) | We really ought to report global data, at least about the virus in other English-speaking countries than the U.S., although I am sure the interests of English-speaking readers extend to the whole world, when it comes to this virus. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:33, 9 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
You are correct, I just don't know who to cite for a good number on this. I will to check around with my virus expert friends. | You are correct, I just don't know who to cite for a good number on this. I will to check around with my virus expert friends. | ||
BTW Larry, I was reading the discussion regarding latin names vs common names, and it led me to wonder if | BTW Larry, I was reading the discussion regarding latin names vs common names, and it led me to wonder if | ||
we need to define a set of rules for viruses regarding family, genus, sero-complexes, and the like. The branches of viral trees are still being debated too, i.e. is Yellow fever the oldest flavivirus or not. | we need to define a set of rules for viruses regarding family, genus, sero-complexes, and the like. The branches of viral trees are still being debated too, i.e. is Yellow fever the oldest flavivirus or not. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 09:05, 9 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:05, 9 October 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup, Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Derek Harkness 13:01, 5 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Article originally drafted by David E. Volk. --Larry Sanger 14:26, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
Capitalisation
Shouldn't this article be named "West Nile virus" with a small "v"? Derek Harkness 13:01, 5 June 2007 (CDT)
Internationalization
We really ought to report global data, at least about the virus in other English-speaking countries than the U.S., although I am sure the interests of English-speaking readers extend to the whole world, when it comes to this virus. --Larry Sanger 08:33, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
You are correct, I just don't know who to cite for a good number on this. I will to check around with my virus expert friends.
BTW Larry, I was reading the discussion regarding latin names vs common names, and it led me to wonder if we need to define a set of rules for viruses regarding family, genus, sero-complexes, and the like. The branches of viral trees are still being debated too, i.e. is Yellow fever the oldest flavivirus or not. David E. Volk 09:05, 9 October 2007 (CDT)
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- Cleanup