Talk:Peanuts: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eric Winesett (Some issues) |
imported>Joshua David Williams (no longer a stub; also replied to Eric Winesett) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = y | | cat_check = y | ||
| status = | | status = 2 | ||
| underlinked = n | | underlinked = n | ||
| cleanup = y | | cleanup = y | ||
| by = [[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] | | by = [[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Right now the first sentence is in present tense, while the rest in past tense. There should probably be some explanation that Peanuts is still in syndication, but there are no new strips being made. However the tense should be consistent. Also, instead of calling it "a popular, multiple award-winning comic strip," there should be verifiable statements to that effect in the article (what awards?). --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:29, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | Right now the first sentence is in present tense, while the rest in past tense. There should probably be some explanation that Peanuts is still in syndication, but there are no new strips being made. However the tense should be consistent. Also, instead of calling it "a popular, multiple award-winning comic strip," there should be verifiable statements to that effect in the article (what awards?). --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:29, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I'll take a look at the tenses and see if I can fix it. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:35, 10 May 2007
| Workgroup category or categories | Literature Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
| Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
| Underlinked article? | No |
| Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
| Checklist last edited by | Joshua David Williams 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Some issues
Right now the first sentence is in present tense, while the rest in past tense. There should probably be some explanation that Peanuts is still in syndication, but there are no new strips being made. However the tense should be consistent. Also, instead of calling it "a popular, multiple award-winning comic strip," there should be verifiable statements to that effect in the article (what awards?). --Eric Winesett 11:29, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'll take a look at the tenses and see if I can fix it. --Joshua David Williams 11:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Literature Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Literature Advanced Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Literature Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Literature Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Literature External Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Literature Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup