Talk:Web browser: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Caesar Schinas No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:I've added a paragraph about each of the big 4 browsers currently popular, and re-sectioned the remainder of the article into a section for history and for other browsers. I think we should not write about (in this article) "browsers" that are really just skins for other browsers, such as the [http://avantbrowser.com/ Avant Browser]. I would not sort by OS, as that only makes sense for IE; everything else is now cross-platform. For browsers other than the big four, I'd suggest sorting by rendering engine and date, or maybe just alphabetically. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 00:20, 13 June 2007 (CDT) | :I've added a paragraph about each of the big 4 browsers currently popular, and re-sectioned the remainder of the article into a section for history and for other browsers. I think we should not write about (in this article) "browsers" that are really just skins for other browsers, such as the [http://avantbrowser.com/ Avant Browser]. I would not sort by OS, as that only makes sense for IE; everything else is now cross-platform. For browsers other than the big four, I'd suggest sorting by rendering engine and date, or maybe just alphabetically. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 00:20, 13 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I've restructured the browser descriptions to sort by rendering engine for modern browsers and date for historical ones, sortof. More work almost certainly needed. I agree about not listing skins on other browsers, but have mentioned a couple as examples. [[User:Caesar Schinas|Caesar Schinas]] 19:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:07, 13 April 2009
Perhaps we should somehow sort the webbrowsers? If we have a subheading and two paragraphs on every web browser in active/recent development, we'll have a massive and useless article. Could we sort them by platform, or perhaps by rendering engine? We could do:
- Windows browsers
- Internet Explorer
- Mac browsers
- Safari
- Linux Browsers
- Konqueror
- Cross-platform browsers
- Opera
- Firefox
We also need some sort of rule about which browsers to cover. -- ZachPruckowski (Speak to me) 12:50, 28 February 2007 (CST)
- I've added a paragraph about each of the big 4 browsers currently popular, and re-sectioned the remainder of the article into a section for history and for other browsers. I think we should not write about (in this article) "browsers" that are really just skins for other browsers, such as the Avant Browser. I would not sort by OS, as that only makes sense for IE; everything else is now cross-platform. For browsers other than the big four, I'd suggest sorting by rendering engine and date, or maybe just alphabetically. Anthony Argyriou 00:20, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
- I've restructured the browser descriptions to sort by rendering engine for modern browsers and date for historical ones, sortof. More work almost certainly needed. I agree about not listing skins on other browsers, but have mentioned a couple as examples. Caesar Schinas 19:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)