Talk:Lambert W function: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Fredrik Johansson
(What's missing?)
imported>Catherine Woodgold
(→‎What's missing?: Nothing -- looks fine to me, a non-expert)
Line 13: Line 13:
== What's missing? ==
== What's missing? ==


I think this article is fairly complete. I'd like to flesh out the history section a bit and perhaps add one or two more examples of usage. Obviously, there is a lot more that *could* be said, notably about the complex branch structure; but that topic might be overkill for an "introductory" article. What does the rest of you think? [[User:Fredrik Johansson|Fredrik Johansson]] 08:42, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
I think this article is fairly complete. I'd like to flesh out the history section a bit and perhaps add one or two more examples of usage. Obviously, there is a lot more that *could* be said, notably about the complex branch structure; but that topic might be overkill for an "introductory" article. What do the rest of you think? [[User:Fredrik Johansson|Fredrik Johansson]] 08:42, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
 
:I was not previously familiar with the W function, but I read and enjoyed the article and didn't find a single error of grammar or anything else I could change. --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 20:55, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:55, 28 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Lambert W function"
Workgroup category or categories Mathematics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Fredrik Johansson 07:35, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





What's missing?

I think this article is fairly complete. I'd like to flesh out the history section a bit and perhaps add one or two more examples of usage. Obviously, there is a lot more that *could* be said, notably about the complex branch structure; but that topic might be overkill for an "introductory" article. What do the rest of you think? Fredrik Johansson 08:42, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

I was not previously familiar with the W function, but I read and enjoyed the article and didn't find a single error of grammar or anything else I could change. --Catherine Woodgold 20:55, 28 April 2007 (CDT)