Talk:Fundamental Theorem of Algebra: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (→W.l.o.g.: Another thing to say explicitly) |
imported>Paul Wormer |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
: Also "counting multiplicity" - I'm guessing that it means that Tp=Tq (e.g. in (x + 2)(x + 2)), but you ought to say that explicitly. Other than that, great intro - crystal clear. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 09:59, 14 March 2008 (CDT) | : Also "counting multiplicity" - I'm guessing that it means that Tp=Tq (e.g. in (x + 2)(x + 2)), but you ought to say that explicitly. Other than that, great intro - crystal clear. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 09:59, 14 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
:: I think W.l.o.g. means "without loss of generality" and I don't see any connection with multiplicity of roots. You and I differing on intepretation, I wouldn't call the article crystal clear.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:42, 14 March 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:42, 14 March 2008
just started the article
This is some material that used to be in the complex number article, but I felt an entire article on the fundamental theorem of algebra would be the better place for it. However all I did was cut and paste from there to here, so this article doesn't have a good structure yet. Feel free to attack it! - Greg Martin 18:54, 29 April 2007 (CDT); clarified by Jitse Niesen 02:35, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
W.l.o.g.
What does this mean?--Paul Wormer 21:12, 13 March 2008 (CDT)
- Also "counting multiplicity" - I'm guessing that it means that Tp=Tq (e.g. in (x + 2)(x + 2)), but you ought to say that explicitly. Other than that, great intro - crystal clear. J. Noel Chiappa 09:59, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
- I think W.l.o.g. means "without loss of generality" and I don't see any connection with multiplicity of roots. You and I differing on intepretation, I wouldn't call the article crystal clear.--Paul Wormer 10:42, 14 March 2008 (CDT)