Talk:Sexually transmitted disease: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter A. Lipson (→Images) |
imported>Nancy Sculerati No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::it's still basically a stub, along with today's other addtions, so we'll work on it.--[[User:Peter A. Lipson|Peter A. Lipson]] 13:01, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | ::it's still basically a stub, along with today's other addtions, so we'll work on it.--[[User:Peter A. Lipson|Peter A. Lipson]] 13:01, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
As you know, I am a proponent of medical articles that provide patient information- but this article, in its present undeveloped state, reads like a patient hand-out rather than an encyclopedia entry. Ideally, it should be aimed at an audience that includes patients, but also physicians, nurses, other health scientists and somebody "doing a report" on STD. How can we work together to fix this? [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:53, 4 May 2007
Images
This is an article that I think should have (adequately cropped) images. Stephen Ewen 12:46, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
- it's still basically a stub, along with today's other addtions, so we'll work on it.--Peter A. Lipson 13:01, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
As you know, I am a proponent of medical articles that provide patient information- but this article, in its present undeveloped state, reads like a patient hand-out rather than an encyclopedia entry. Ideally, it should be aimed at an audience that includes patients, but also physicians, nurses, other health scientists and somebody "doing a report" on STD. How can we work together to fix this? Nancy Sculerati 09:53, 4 May 2007 (CDT)